Quick note to the “crazies”

More teachable moments by Dennis….

Couple of quick notes to the crazies:
1. Orly: Noticed your comment that these judges are all traitors because they will not “investigate” Obama. Judges do not investigate. That is simply not their job. Maybe that bogus online law school you went to skipped a few things.

2. Sibley: By “running” a two-bit write-in campaign, this gives you standing in filing this lawsuit? Please check the dubious and unsuccessful track record of fellow nut job Alan Keyes. He has already tried this stunt. Didn’t work. Don’t you read the newspapers?

3. Fat Ass aka Liar Butt SinkLiar: Just saw your most recent blog piece where you continue with another long and largely incoherent rant about Ali (who the hell cares) Akbar. You are making a lot of accusations but to be honest, it would appear that he never quite got it together to complete the scam you are claiming. If it was intended to be a scam (and maybe it was), it sounds as if it went pretty badly in terms of final completion. Which kind of means that you are repeatedly accusing him of something that, no matter what, never quite happen which also means that you are currently committing a wild act of defamation while also severely damaging the man’s reputation and ability to conduct business (legal or not). So basically, you could be sued big time (and just might be).

So here some quick pointers:

A. YOU DIDN’T WIN THE PARISI SUIT, ASSHOLE! Get that into your fat skull. Parisi’s attorney couldn’t get the judge to accept the case. They were claiming that your crap cost Parisi $5 million worth of business but had no supporting evidence.

In the case of Akbar, you have given him plenty of ample evidence.

B. For a person to be charged with a crime, they have to actually commit it first. You should know this by now. After all, you have committed lots of crimes – not all of which you have been charged with. Your claims against Akbar are largely about what he might have been doing or trying to do. That is not the same thing as actually committing a crime. With your life long criminal history, you should know this by now.

C. The only thing saving your ripe butt from a law suit is the fact that you are not worth much. You make roughly $20,000 to $22,000 a year from ads on your stupid news site. Of course, that all goes to the “business.” Now that I am done laughing my ass of at that one…add whatever you “score” from social security. Then add in the small chump change you are currently getting in the way of donations. So you may be taking in around $30,000 to just under $40,000 a year. Your overhead is low since you are NOT paying for phone, internet, or even housing (sounds like you got a nice pack of “church” ladies covering your fat butt). In a law suit, Akbar would most likely only be able to take the copyright to your’s and Parsons’ crappy books (which are financially worthless) as well as your “business” and with it the web site and maybe dump all legal expenses onto your back. Probably not much else.

But you are open to suit. And if you handle that suit the way you did the Parisi case, your butt will be fried. All Akbar will need is a dog bite attorney.

Thanks Dennis,
Happy Thanksgivings my US friends!