Quick note to the “crazies”

More teachable moments by Dennis….

Couple of quick notes to the crazies:
1. Orly: Noticed your comment that these judges are all traitors because they will not “investigate” Obama. Judges do not investigate. That is simply not their job. Maybe that bogus online law school you went to skipped a few things.

2. Sibley: By “running” a two-bit write-in campaign, this gives you standing in filing this lawsuit? Please check the dubious and unsuccessful track record of fellow nut job Alan Keyes. He has already tried this stunt. Didn’t work. Don’t you read the newspapers?

3. Fat Ass aka Liar Butt SinkLiar: Just saw your most recent blog piece where you continue with another long and largely incoherent rant about Ali (who the hell cares) Akbar. You are making a lot of accusations but to be honest, it would appear that he never quite got it together to complete the scam you are claiming. If it was intended to be a scam (and maybe it was), it sounds as if it went pretty badly in terms of final completion. Which kind of means that you are repeatedly accusing him of something that, no matter what, never quite happen which also means that you are currently committing a wild act of defamation while also severely damaging the man’s reputation and ability to conduct business (legal or not). So basically, you could be sued big time (and just might be).

So here some quick pointers:

A. YOU DIDN’T WIN THE PARISI SUIT, ASSHOLE! Get that into your fat skull. Parisi’s attorney couldn’t get the judge to accept the case. They were claiming that your crap cost Parisi $5 million worth of business but had no supporting evidence.

In the case of Akbar, you have given him plenty of ample evidence.

B. For a person to be charged with a crime, they have to actually commit it first. You should know this by now. After all, you have committed lots of crimes – not all of which you have been charged with. Your claims against Akbar are largely about what he might have been doing or trying to do. That is not the same thing as actually committing a crime. With your life long criminal history, you should know this by now.

C. The only thing saving your ripe butt from a law suit is the fact that you are not worth much. You make roughly $20,000 to $22,000 a year from ads on your stupid news site. Of course, that all goes to the “business.” Now that I am done laughing my ass of at that one…add whatever you “score” from social security. Then add in the small chump change you are currently getting in the way of donations. So you may be taking in around $30,000 to just under $40,000 a year. Your overhead is low since you are NOT paying for phone, internet, or even housing (sounds like you got a nice pack of “church” ladies covering your fat butt). In a law suit, Akbar would most likely only be able to take the copyright to your’s and Parsons’ crappy books (which are financially worthless) as well as your “business” and with it the web site and maybe dump all legal expenses onto your back. Probably not much else.

But you are open to suit. And if you handle that suit the way you did the Parisi case, your butt will be fried. All Akbar will need is a dog bite attorney.

Thanks Dennis,
Happy Thanksgivings my US friends!

 

Blast from the past – Montgoobery Sibley

I happen to be watching the Twitter fight between Ali A.Akbar and Sinclair that’s been going on for days… weeks? Sickliar once again is in his harassing- mode:

Today, I saw this tweet by Akbar:

Ali A. Akbar @ali tweets:

“Larry Sinclair’s non-child support paying and disbarred lawyer talks about his genitalia:”

It’s funny, I  wondered whatever happened to Sinclair’s nutcase  flamboyant  lawyer…it turned out the  kilt-wearing lawyer was  just as big a con man as Sinclair is!

Anyway, by coincidence and out of the blue I received this email from KStreet, with a request, this is what she sent:

“Meesh, if you can, please publish this on TRT when you get the chance, with Ruthie’s permission.   🙂 “

 

Thanks Ruthie!  This is a hoot.  Sibley is a nutcase…he and Sinclair were made for each other.  Losers Extraordinaire! 

I recall Mitch stating…

“A ‘DOUCHE’ IS BEING REPRESENTED BY A ‘TURD’.”

How very true! Here we go h/t Ruthie aka democratista… you read my mind.

Birther Lawyer and Write-in Candidate Is Suing Electoral College

If you were curious about what the disbarred lawyer, former Florida inmate, bagpipe-blowing fringe candidate Montgomery Blair Sibley thinks about last week’s election, you’re in luck. He thinks it stinks.

Sibley, who has been disbarred from 13 different federal courts and three state bars during his career, is suing D.C.’s three representatives to the Electoral College, which is slated to meet next month and confirm that President Obama won on November 6. And, like he always does, Sibley doubts Obama’s legitimacy to hold the office to which he just won another four years.

In one complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Sibley calls Obama’s birth certificate, college transcripts and other identifying documents “questionable.” So, basically the same birther shit as usual.

His second complaint takes direct aim at the Electoral College itself. Citing the 12th and 23rd amendments, Sibley hopes to stop the 332 electors pledge to Obama from voting for a candidate he sees as illegitimate. Or something like that.

“It is inane to image the framers of our Constitution authorizing the presidential electors to vote for a person who fails to qualify for that office,” Sibley—who of course doesn’t know anything about inanity—said in a news release.

Sibley tried to petition the U.S. Supreme Court to take up the issue in March. The high court declined. Maybe because Sibley has twice accused the Supreme Court of treason; more likely, the justices didn’t feel like wasting their time with this putz.

Who knows? Maybe Sibley’s just raw about losing last week’s election and this is his way of airing his grievances. Anyway, as we always include it when writing about Sibley, enjoy this photo of him blowing into some bagpipes.

In Sibley’s own words…. http://montgomeryblairsibley.com/

Greetings:My quixotic run for President is over. My obligation to challenge the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama, II to be President is not.I have filed two lawsuits in the District of Columbia. The first Complaint – Sibley vs. Obama– invokes the ancient writ of quo warranto to have the U.S. District Court compel Mr. Obama to demonstrate that he is eligible for the office of President. The questionable certificates of live births released by Mr. Obama, his questionable social security number and selective service registration and his refusal to authorize release of college transcripts which would establish his status as a citizen are all brought to the Court’s attention by the Complaint. Everyone else in these United States has to demonstrate they are U.S. Citizens in order to be employed, why not Mr. Obama before he is employed by us as our President?The second Complaint – Sibley vs. Alexander, Dinan and Lightfoot – is a class action complaint filed in D.C. Superior Court against the District of Columbia members of the so-called Electoral College as class representatives of the so-called Electoral College. The Complaint seek an injunction preventing any and all of the 538 Electors authorized by the Twelfth and Twenty-Third Amendments to the Constitution from casting their votes for an ineligible candidate, i.e., Mr. Obama. My Motion for Preliminary Injunctionis pending a hearing date to be set by Judge John Mott.You can help me defray the significant costs of pursuing my litigation strategy to test Obama’s eligibility to be President by either directly donating any amount you can: Or buying either a soft-cover or hardcover copy of my book – The Justicide Brief. The soft-cover edition sells for $50. The hard-cover edition sells for $250. Thanks!