The Regulator Too

Welcome to our strange and wonderful place!

Lookie “Go Fund Me” Fundraiser

on May 3, 2014

While trolling around SinclairNews’ pathetic Twitter channel https://twitter.com/SinclairNews  I found the tweet below and then other information unfolded with a video.

I’m certain Sinclair was advised  against posting further online but the “narcissist” can’t help himself, what does he do? He creates a video filled with threats.

Good Luck goes to his ATY/ Karl,S. Tameler!

Disclaimer: “The RegulatorToo” makes all reasonable efforts to ensure that  our viewers are prepared.The content of this video may be detrimental to your health (nausea, and  vision). View with utmost caution and at your own risk, suggested,wear a pair of sturdy hipwaders.

 

“Why I need you to Contribute through Go Fund Me

Published on 12 Apr 2014 by Larry Sinclair

The Go Fund Me account that was recently set up was done so that I might be able to hire the Attorney I need to fight these false charges which certain former DA’s have kept active for nothing more than to score political points and favors from other.

Please help us raise the $15,000.00 we need to cover the legal fees needed if this case is taken to trial and the $5000 needed before the Attorney makes his formal appearance.” Updated posted by Larry Sinclair 20 days ago “Please take a moment and listed  <– :eyeroll: to the brief video clip I have shared with you. Your help is being sought so that I might be able to defend myself against charges the prosecutors already know are false, but who continue to push the case not for Justice, but for Political posturing.

 And for whoever’s interested – here’s Larry’s FUNDRAISING site…

Larry’s Legal Defense Fund”—-> http://www.gofundme.com/873wtc

 

 1780819_837697756257382_1145041169_nCreated by Larry Sinclair on April 9, 2014  DAYTONA BEACH, FL

 On March 20, 2014 I was arrested on a warrant from Colorado which was changed in December 2012 in retaliation for my filing a FOIA request against a Deputy Distrcit Attorney in Pueblo, Colorado. The warrant which was originally issued in 2001 and was then taken and turned into a Political football in the 2008 Presidential elections was to be dismissed altogether in 2008. Former Deputy DA Stephen A. Jones (for political purposes) filed a factually false motion before a Judge in December 2012 asking that the warrant be amended to nationwide in retaliation for filing of FOIA request against him and his office. Since my arrest I have posted the bond and flew from my home in Florida to Colorado. I need to hire an Attorney in Colorado and I need to travel back and forth between Florida and Colorado until this matter is resolved. I have put all of my art collection up for sale along with a 1995 bottle of Dom Perignon but until they sell I need to raise $15,000 ($10,000) required to hire Attorney before April 28, 2014. In addition to my art collection I am putting the complete rights to my first book up for sale as well. The charges are false and even though the prosecuters know them to be false, they continue to push the matter for political posturing for themselves.”

Pretty pathetic or surprising that  he’s got $500 collected.

And now it’s time for Dennis’ Teachable Moments (views about the video) :

Proffesor_dennisOK, where do we start.

1. They are not alleged charges. They are simply charges. Signed, sealed and delivered in court etc etc. So you are up on charges for alleged crimes. Keep it straight, asshole.

2. As for your claim that the charges were suppose to have been dismissed – who cares. The only thing that matters is what is in the court record. The only move on record was your own half-baked attempt to get the charges dismissed (remember that brain tumor thing) and that was tossed by the judge. So the charges were never dismissed, period. It doesn’t matter if some one at the DA’s office made some weird claim for you to save your money and not come back etc (which doesn’t even sound like any DA I have ever met – and I have met a few). Nothing happened in the court record. That is the only record that matters in this issue. Further, the DA’s office couldn’t dismiss it on their own. It would have to be dismissed by the judge. Oh sure, the DA could go in and say that they are wanting to withdraw the charges, but the judge then has to say Hokey Dokey. Case dismissed. Of course they would also want you ideally to be in court for this moment. So where were you?

3. Why are you wasting your time going online with your long winded, sorry ass, and extremely confusing “defense” when you have an attorney who’s job is to go before the judge and the DA and make your defense. Not only are your numerous online postings meaningless, but your own attorney should be telling you to shut the hell up while he tries to figure out your defense. That is what you are paying him for.

4. No, you do not get to threaten everybody with putting them on the stand. Your attorney gets to figure out who to call as a witness. You don’t get to call anybody. Again, that is what you are paying him for. May I also warn you right now that you are getting close to “witness intimation,” and your own attorney will tell you that you need to add to the charges like he needs more idiots like you for clients.

5. Quit trying to skirt around the fugitive in flight issue. It doesn’t matter if you kept popping up online letting people know where you were and stuff. You skipped out on the charges and never came back. That is fugitive flight. No ifs, no ands, no buts. What do you call it. A vacation?

So you are on YouTube hustling for money? So far you have 32 viewers. Discounting some one like myself (who watched for the hope of some cheap laughs), you have had about maybe 15 real viewers tops? You need how much? Good luck with that, Charley. You come off in the video as too pathetic to be lame and too lame to be pathetic. But the nasal tone hacking and snorting sound effects combined with the poor quality slasher flick lighting design really makes this video a perverse must see.

Last thing: Do I have this straight. Your defense is that you were in Texas shacking up with a male hooker while some one unknown forged those checks and popped them into your bank account? Gee, what a fiend this person must be. Maybe it’s that bogus DA who kept telling you to save your drinking money and not worry about those silly charges?

 

And now it’s Where’s The Proof Larry?’s turn to weigh in…

 

4a1a88c89c4ef2cebbee6cbcd2479698.jpg WTPL avatarI was reviewing his affidavit along with the video above

As we’ve said many times before, this has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with the facts and circumstances in this case as I know them from the information he has provided. He won’t accept that. That’s a key part of his problem as a habitual offender – it’s always someone else’s fault. This happened in 2000-2001 – long before he can claim he had anything to do with politics. His innocence or guilt isn’t going to be determined by politics. It will be determined by a jury of his peers judging his innocence or guilt based upon the facts in this case – if it even gets that far.

I don’t care to go into the details of why but after my review this evening, he is in deep, deep shit. Anything can happen in a court case, but the odds of him prevailing on the original criminal charges seem slim to me.

Another thing that hit me reviewing his affidavit was the hypocrisy of him complaining to the court authorities about the threats of harm and death threats directed towards him and his family. Isn’t that what he’s done to us for six years? Meesh is still getting them on this blog. So just maybe, justice is about to be done on that count. I truly hope so. His claims about us doing that back to him are as facetious as his claims against past Deputy DA Jones. Some guy threatened him on Youtube but he had nothing to do with us.

My father nearly yanked me out of a private boys school when I was young for fighting. I absolutely couldn’t stand bullies. I was reflecting on that here some. I wasn’t big but I could take care of myself. I didn’t lose a fight.

One thing that troubled me about it was flirting with hypocrisy. I was in effect bullying the bully to get “my way”. And because it takes two to fight, it made it less clear within the school who was on the side of right – in spite of the fact that after my first fight, I made it crystal clear why I had fought and would continue to fight if the school didn’t do something about the bullying. To some extent, we have experienced that here. Mitch alluded to it on the M&N blog not long before they shut it down.

When you get down in the mud scrapping with a scumbag like Sinclair, you get dirty. There’s a long history and it’s not simple to explain – or I haven’t found a way to concisely explain it. It’s therefore, harder for folks on the outside to identify who is on the side of right.

A key thing I couldn’t stand about bullies was they would pick on guys who physically couldn’t fight back – ALWAYS. To some degree, we’ve seen that with Sinclair’s threats. The people he’s really gone hard after more frequently are the women: Sheila, Lynne, Meesh, etc. I have great disdain for him for that. It sunk in about a week ago during an email exchange with Sheila. She had to look after her grandson who was home with asthma and on another day take him or another of her grandchildren to a soccer game.

And so it bothers me that this heartless sick prick IS GOING AFTER A GRANDMOTHER! (again)

And just maybe that’s a part of what bothers him: that a bunch of housewives and grandmothers – NOT paid Obama bloggers like he’s claimed – stood up to his threats and intimidation on their own dime and kicked his sorry ass.

I’m so proud of you ladies. I really am

Advertisements

143 responses to “Lookie “Go Fund Me” Fundraiser

  1. So are we supposed to believe that not only did he sell the rights to his rag on two days notice but that he also raised $5000 to retain his lawyer in less than two weeks? I don’t buy it – especially
    using THAT video to solicit funds.

  2. Meesh says:

    No LTL, if you look up, I added the website on the post…he’s collected $500 or so he claims.

    • But my point was that on the date the video was posted (April 12) he claimed he needed $5000 to retain an attorney. And it appears an attorney entered his appearance on April 25. So are we supposed to believe that Legion raised that $5000 in 13 days?

  3. tjtaygee says:

    Oh dear, it would seem liarr-larr hasn’t stopped his lying ways…the “gift” for a $10,000 donation on go fund me:

    Exclusive rights to book Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder 1 of 1 left

    Butbutbut he said on lsnewsgroup that the rights had been sold on Apr 24….quoting “The rights to the book have in fact been sold by Sinclair and will no longer be sold on this website”

    but it’s may 3rd as of me typing and the $10k contribution gift is still available.

    Oh dear oh dear oh dear, he just doesn’t know how to stop…

  4. Dennis says:

    TJT,
    You have left out the full gift package: “I have put all of my art collection up for sale along with a 1995 bottle of Dom Perignon but until they sell I need to raise $15,000 ($10,000) required to hire Attorney before April 28, 2014.

    In addition to my art collection I am putting the complete rights to my first book up for sale as well.”

    In other words, you are trying to sell a bottle of booze, a “collection” of largely insignificant prints, and the copyright to a crappy book whose market came and went over four years ago? Sounds like a plan to me. BTW, the Dom Perignon is technically the only item listed that might actually be worth something (depending upon how you have stored it – oh, you stored it in your belly, I see, never mind). Even so, that is only around $160 to $250 tops. Just enough to get you one hour of attorney’s time. The rest you can flush down the toilet (unless you are hoping that the truly stupid are passing by).

  5. Meesh says:

    *waves to TJTaygee* The post has been updated, thanks Dennis!

  6. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    The video only has 32 views, some of which are by us.

    His attorney won’t be happy with that video.

    He defames Deputy DA Jones AGAIN! Having followed Sinclair on and off for six years, I can’t believe the pounding this guy takes and I’d never heard of him until Sinclair’s recent article. As we’ve covered before, Sinclair is just plain wrong on his analysis.

    I can’t believe he’s trying to make out that there’s political motives involved in trying to convict him … from politicians in 2000!!!

    “I want people to believe that these charges are about politics and have been made about politics since the 2000 presidential election.

    Is Larry going to come out and claim he sucked off George W Bush and did cocaine with him too when he was in Texas??? (this one made me laugh out loud – it’s an approach like a failed broken record that time traveled back into the past to 2001 when he was charged!!!)

    His argument that he was with them in Texas or Mexico doesn’t seem to mean much. The facts remains that her IRS checks wound up in his bank account, he admits depositing them and she objects to that happening.

    In the video, in my opinion, he makes a partial admission he evaded the warrant. Bad news for his fugitive flight defense.

    Now if he really offered “three times” to come to Colorado to address these charges, why is he whining now? All they’re effectively doing now is saying “Ok, we’ll accept your offer to come to Colorado.”

    Now if he felt so entitled to evade the state only warrant, why should out of state witnesses respond to a Colorado state subpoena? I’m not convinced they have to because Colorado state doesn’t have out of state jurisdiction. It’s more complicated than that. And more expensive (money he doesn’t have) to accomplish what he’s talking about. Here’s the first site that popped up to save me typing on the issue:
    http://www.legalargument.net/outsubpoenas.html
    His veiled threats to “everyone from 1999 on ..” (paraphrased) have a lot of hurdles to overcome.

    He always looks rough but looks even worse in that video. Bad lighting, almost like the flashlight below your chin look and then some. He looks pretty scared and worried.

    “I’m not asking you to help me get out of something. I’m asking you to help me raise the funds that I need to pay an attorney …

    (to help me get out of something – : ) ) Classic Sinclair doublespeak. Reminds me of “it’s not so much as to whether you believe me or not, as much as you hear me.” (send money now!!) Sinclair, June 2008. Tell that to the judge in Colorado, ok?

    “without having to be concerned with the political fallout from one direction or the other”

    What political fallout for a career small time felon in forgery and deception?? Nobody’s paying attention anymore because his bogus allegations against Obama have no political value.

    We don’t “have the balls to put a face on a screen name” because we don’t want a sick fuck like Sinclair coming over to burn our house down or do our families harm like he’s threatened. The threats, assaults and fire he tried to start in Colorado prison was convincing. I did offer to meet him face to face in Colorado. But it was he who didn’t have the balls to show up.

    • Dennis says:

      He half admits he was evading the warrant? Heck, he basically admits that the checks ended up in his account too. The dumb ass is practically admitting to the charges and still thinks he can win this case. I am beginning to suspect that we can soon begin a countdown to the moment that Fat Boy’s attorney dismisses him as a client.

  7. And what a bizarre claim – that he practically begged “not once, not twice, but three separate times” to come in and straighten the matter out, but the D.A. told him repeatedly “not to bother” and to “save your money.” Now why would the D.A. care what Legion did with his time or money? He had better watch out that he doesn’t get perjury charges thrown in, to boot.

    • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

      Let’s recap:
      06/18/08: Press Statement of Larry Sinclair (transcripts)
      “I have a pending motion to dismiss this warrant which I am waiting to have calendared by the Colorado Court.” He’d been waiting for it to be “calendared” since 2004 when he made the motion ..

      Around Oct 6th 2008:
      Sinclair claims “Colorado is no longer an issue. I will only say that much. But uh, I have been directed officially by the District Attorney’s office in Colorado that “don’t worry about it.” In fact, I offered to go personally just for it to be dismissed and I was told not to even to waste that money to do that, it’s unnecessary.”

      We call several sources, find out that’s BS and report it on the blog Oct 7th, 2008

      From the docket
      http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/214651629?access_key=key-1gq36ncbiea1akogmqj7&allow_share=true&escape=false&view_mode=scroll
      Oct 10th, 2008 Colorado renews the warrant
      Nov 4th, 2008, right after Obama wins, Sinclair files a motion and requests a public defender

      I’ll bet he’d have a real tough time reconciling that 2008 motion with everything he’s said online

      We have tons of his quotes on this. We need to collect them up.

      • “Nov 4th, 2008, right after Obama wins, Sinclair files a motion and requests a public defender”

        Do you know the outcome of that motion and request?

        • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

          Not much except it didn’t change the status of the warrant that remained active and state only. From the docket, there was agreement that a public defender would be available to him so that request was granted.

          And that’s a killer point on the fugitive flight issue (again). Even if he’d misunderstood his conversation with the DA’s office in early Oct 2008 that the case was being dismissed, We corrected him on our blog Oct 7th, 2008. The DA renewed the warrant Oct 10th, 2008. And by Nov 4th, 2008, there was absolutely no misunderstanding as Sinclair applied for a public defender and made another motion.

          • Okay since the November motion was made AFTER the October warrant renewal and there was no express denial of the motion you can be sure his lawyer will jump all over that fact and argue it created enough ambiguity regarding the status of the warrant to support reasonable doubt as to his culpability for the fugitive flight charge. The judge is not likely to buy it but a jury just might.

            • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

              His lawyer probably already knows why he can’t jump all over it.

              Why is the judge required to respond to a motion that does not follow the court’s procedure? If Sinclair doesn’t make a motion to appear pro se or get an attorney properly assigned to represent him, what obligation does a judge have to respond to his motion to dismiss? None that I can think of.

              And if he doesn’t provide the court with a proper address or phone number for 7 years, how is the court supposed to contact him? They may well have sent something to his mother’s house and he can say “I never got it”. But it’s his responsibility to keep in contact with the court – not theirs to keep tabs on where he’s moving to.

              On April 28, 2014, Sinclair finally did what he was supposed to do with this case since 2001. Show up with a lawyer or make arrangements to appear pro se. It’s pretty simple.

              Quite frankly, he’s been around the block enough in criminal and civil court, sending courts documents, to know that. But the court doesn’t know he knows that. So it buys him time to make the thing go away while he pretends he doesn’t know and so that muddies fugitive flight accusations.

              He went pro se against the Colorado Corrections – 16 times before ’99 (including appeals). He went pro se against Vivian Bowman in ’07. He went pro se against Obama in ’08. Now those were civil cases but he knows court procedure. He’s been in them countless times criminal and civil all his life. He knows how an attorney makes an appearance on a case.

              It’s all a game with him. I think he knew exactly what he was doing.

  8. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    Below his video:

    Published on Apr 12, 2014
    The Go Fund Me account that was recently set up was done so that I might be able to hire the Attorney I need to fight these false charges which certain former DA’s have kept active for nothing more than to score political points and favors from other.

    Please help us raise the $15,000.00 we need to cover the legal fees needed if this case is taken to trial and the $5000 needed before the Attorney makes his formal appearance.

    http://www.gofundme.com/873wtc

    From GoFundMe:
    http://www.gofundme.com/873wtc

    He’s dropped the price on his book (I presume since sold) to $10,000
    https://funds.gofundme.com/index.php?route=donate2/donate&url=873wtc&amt=10000
    And he’s also selling several thousand dollars worth of art. Just amazing how a guy on less than $700 per month SSDI stretches a dollar!!!

    And on that GoFundMe link

    I need to raise $15,000 ($10,000) required to hire Attorney before April 28, 2014.

    the “attorney math” has apparently changed some from his youtube post.

  9. Man, in that video he looks really bad – and he seems to be on something. Yeah, he’s scared. But I can’t figure out why he’s still out on bail considering he’s charged with fugitive flight. That’s puzzling. I guess the D.A. will realize his mistake AFTER Legion flees again.

  10. frankndouche says:

    Fatty Tuna Douche. What a fucking piece of shit.

  11. frankndouche says:

    And by the way, you can buy a signed, limited edition “1492” by John Mecray for $800 you fat pile of dung.

  12. Dennis says:

    One more note: I suggested that Fatso was getting close to witness intimation (see http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-witness-intimidation.htm). In fact, one form of witness intimation is: “Another form of witness intimidation is cultural pressure. In certain groups and segments of society, cooperation with law enforcement is considered taboo, and many witnesses to crimes refuse to cooperate, even if it means violent criminals remain free to continue their criminal activity. Cultural expressions that glorify illegal activity also demonize law enforcement and those who cooperate with it, further reinforcing the taboo. Sometimes, an effort is made to suggest that the object of the taboo isn’t the honest witness who offers eyewitness testimony of a crime, but those who act as informants, or “snitches,” to law enforcement, or those who offer testimony against a defendant in return for favorable treatment in their own criminal cases or incarceration. These snitches, it’s claimed, will exaggerate or lie to improve their own situation.”

    Based upon his so-called Defense posting (Part One) as well as his comments on his YouTube video, Sinclair may have already crossed the line. He is, most likely, right at the border. So come on, Fat Boy. Go for it! Show us just how stupid you really are!

  13. tjtaygee says:

    Liar-larr – when you stop by again (*waves*), would you care to explain if the rights to the book werealready sold, they’re available on GoFundMe for $10k now?

  14. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    Another probably lie in that video is his claim that they knew where he was at all times. If that were really true, then:
    1. Why was the 2004 affidavit signed by someone else and the address given c/o his mother’s address (he could have redacted BUT ..
    2. If it was determined that he was not living in Colorado (he said many times he was in Mexico from 2003-2006), that might have triggered them to change the state only warrant to nationwide and ..
    3. The key reason he submitted the 2004 warrant was to keep his Colorado SSDI checks coming. If Colorado SSDI found out he wasn’t living in the state – which he wasn’t, he was in Mexico, they would have cut him off.

    Another apparent lie is his claim that they never arrested him for this:

    “I have not been arrested nor have I posted any bond on this charge”
    Larry For Congress 2010, Let’s Set the Record Straight, Facebook, March 2010

    but the docket says he was arrested May 8th, 2008 for this crime. Like Delaware, the warrant was issued 2 weeks later when they apparently couldn’t find him.

  15. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    06/18/08: Press Statement of Larry Sinclair (transcripts)
    “I have a pending motion to dismiss this warrant which I am waiting to have calendared by the Colorado Court.”

    In the three bloggers case, where Sinclair was the plaintiff, if our bloggers had just written the court a letter without legal representation disguised as a motion (like he did in the Colorado case) and effectively said “This is BS. Dismiss the case … etc (in nicer words but like him, with no evidence or legitimate legal rational)” and the court waited four years to “calendar this motion”, how many here think Sinclair would still be sitting, twiddling this thumbs still waiting for the court to do something? He’d have howled to every civil servant he could find – posting the phone calls on the internet, ranting in all his radio interviews and also calling the Supreme Court, the Governor, Congress, the President, AG Holder, and the United Nations and all the World leaders by now – screaming for justice.

    Right? That’s his MO we’ve seen countless times.

    But when Al Stoller or Vivian Bowman are after money or Delaware, Florida or Colorado or FBI agent Henly want to address a crime, he fucks off and is nowhere to be found.

    Parisi was different because his book was at stake. Like now, if he didn’t fight, he’d lose something important to him.

    • I don’t know exactly what they mean in Colorado when they say “CALENDAR” a motion. It probably means putting the motion on the court calendar for argument. But if there was a mere docket entry that a motion was filed, an argument could be made that there should have been a docket entry that the motion was denied, and until then he could make an argument, however weak, that he thought the motion was still pending – thereby relieving him of the duty to return until the motion was formally denied. A juror might buy it. A judge probably wouldn’t. That’s why he would want a jury trial. On the other hand he is so repulsive in his character, appearance and delivery that it would be difficult to keep most jurors from involuntarily gagging just looking at him and hearing him on the witness stand. So what to do? Take a long shot at a trial? You’d better believe the D.A. WILL NOT give him time to “get his affairs in order” if he’s convicted. So he has to choose between the long shot of not being convicted of SOMETHING and the long shot of not being captured once he flees again.

      To flee or not to flee, that is the question.

  16. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    So he went beyond disparaging past Deputy DA Stephen Jones (repeating this again in the video and text on Youtube and again in his post on the Go Fund Me site)

    Former Deputy DA Stephen A. Jones (for political purposes) filed a factually false motion before a Judge in December 2012 asking that the warrant be amended to nationwide in retaliation for filing of FOIA request against him and his office.

    It was that FOIA request that inspired past Deputy DA Jones to flip the warrant to nationwide.

    but he goes on to defame the new District attorneys handling this case (I’d missed that):
    http://www.gofundme.com/873wtc

    “The charges are false and even though the prosecuters know them to be false, they continue to push the matter for political posturing for themselves.”

    Of course, the low number of views on his video confirm how deluded he is about his “political significance”.

    I guess that quote would make chapter one of “How to inspire a DA to fry your ass in criminal court after inspiring the past DA to fry your ass in criminal court”.

    Hopefully, for their sake, Larry doesn’t find out who their family members are (note to DA: he sometimes likes to go after dying grandmothers, grandfathers and young kids around 8-11 years old of people he doesn’t like … ).

    The good news is the judge won’t get defamed by Larry as a “DC Insider” (like Judge Bates in Feb 09) quid pro quo for a seat on the Supreme court until after he renders his sentence.

  17. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    http://sinclairwatch.wordpress.com/2010/02/12/this-time-the-fbi-sets-their-sights-on-larry-sinclair/

    “In the course of speaking with the Secret Service today I was amused to find out that FBI Special Agent Robert Henry/Henly of Laredo, Texas contacted them and offered to assist them in any way he could. My amusement came from the fact that even the Secret Service knew Agent Henly has been in direct contact with “your Internet enemies,” and “is trying to put together something to present to the U.S. Attorney….” Agent Henly does not worry me, I know exactly who he is and what he is. See in this country our law enforcement officials are supposed to uphold the law, FBI Special Agent Henry/Henly of Laredo, Texas has not only violated the law, but has used his position in the FBI to attack citizens on the Internet and to assist in the threatening, harassment and intimidation of citizens.

    In March 2007 SA Henry/Henly knowingly abused his authority and took the “COLORADO ONLY” warrant (that people have been beating me over the head with the past two + years) and asked the Laredo Police Department to back him up in pulling a massive gun’s drawn raid on me and my home. It was a scene right out of the movies, I had noticed cars outside my home that didn’t belong and notified my neighbors. I even called and reported them to the Laredo Police. While outside in my neighbors yard watching all the unmarked cars, my neighbor and I both saw Police cars coming from all directions (marked and unmarked) more than 60 in all. Then guys jumping out of cars with guns drawn ordering me to the ground, ordering my neighbor to the ground, etc….on a warrant from Colorado that even the Laredo Police admitted they told Agent Henly was valid in Colorado ONLY! The Laredo Police Department Detectives told me to remember “we are only here because we were ordered to give back up, this is an FBI operation NOT a Laredo Police operation.” SA /HenryHenly is a liar and a fraud. Agent /HenryHenly is as corrupt as most Mexican Police on the border, he knows it and I know it.”

    Sinclair, Feb 2010

    So he defames agent Henly and admits knowing the Colorado warrant was still active in April ’07. But did nothing about it until well after we found out about it a year later when he didn’t disclose it in Jan 2008. Due to the public pressure we’d put on him and in a panic to respond to it when Obama won, on Nov 4th, he finally decided for his own good, feeling vulnerable in the wake of Obama’s victory, he’d better address it.

    What Sinclair himself reports the NCIC (National Crime Information Center) records as saying around that time to explain that raid is:
    https://www.lsnewsgroup.com/liberal-conservative-independent-libertarian-you-all-should-be-outraged/

    4/2/07 – Alien Smuggling – US Border Patrol

    Despite showing an arrest in Arizona on April 2, 2007 for Alien Smuggling, the FBI NCIC Database is incorrect. The above incident occurred in Laredo, TX and did not result in an arrest or charge.

    We spoke to several witnesses of that event in Laredo. Agent Henly wasn’t raiding Sinclair because of the Colorado warrant. That’s just typical pure BS from Sinclair. The complaint from the Hotel that started it was all the illegal aliens Sinclair had – something like 12-15 per room.

    But the major point is: Sinclair knew in Apr 2007 that his motion in Aug 2004 had not succeeded and this warrant was still active.

  18. tjtaygee says:

    Instead of GoFundMe regarding liar-larr, am I truly the first to suggest instead “GoFukYourself”?

    • Meesh says:

      Yep, you’re the first TJ, that should have been his title to replace the word “Fund” perhaps he would have attracted a wider audience? Heh wait, maybe that’s what happened, he only collected $500 – the rest of *his tard friends* couldn’t read correctly and are doing exactly what he’s implying them to do….

  19. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    Netvaluator:
    larrysinclair com estimated worth is: $9.95 and have a daily income of around $0.10. 🙂
    lsnewsgroup com estimated worth is: $803.09 and have a daily income of around $2.23.
    “WOT Trustworthiness: Very Poor
    WOT Privacy: Very Poor
    WOT Child Safety: Very Poor”

    Search for:
    Larry Sinclair Websites:
    “Interest over time. Web Search. Worldwide, 2004 – present.
    Not enough search volume to show results.”

    Just imagine what it would be worth if he hadn’t put six years worth of BS and effort into it!

    • Meesh says:

      B-b-b-but on Larry’s Linkedin w/site in parts it says this…

      Sinclair News-LS News Group
      “….Since formation of Sinclair News-LS News Group we have become one of the fast growing online news organizations in terms of visitor traffic in the world increasing our Global rankings by more than 1 million spots in less than 60 days.

      • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

        Sinclair News.Net lsnewsgroup.com
        “Grown rating: 0 rated by Todaytopsites.com”

        From Alexa
        http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/lsnewsgroup.com

        Global Rank
        Alexa Traffic Rank
        A rough estimate of this site’s popularity.

        The rank is calculated using a combination of average daily visitors to this site and pageviews on this site over the past 3 months. The site with the highest combination of visitors and pageviews is ranked #1.

        Updated Daily:
        Global rank 3,306,728
        DOWN 1,584,991

        • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

          His Laredo Hungry Bottom page soliciting to be gang banged by anonymous male strangers might have got him more belly slaps on his cheeks than his website got hits. 🙂

        • Dennis says:

          Yes, his web site ranking has gone so low that you can’t even find it with a microscope. A few of us may be the only steady readers he’s got. And does he ever thank us. Nooooooooooo. What an ungrateful bastard.

  20. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    Convicted habitual offender bank robber gets 1,256 years in prison in Colorado
    http://gazette.com/article/141658

    Keener, 31, was sentenced Friday to 1,256 years in prison – a result of Colorado’s stiff sentencing for repeat criminals and one of the most severe penalties in El Paso County’s recent history.
    ….
    Police described Keener as a “career criminal” in announcing his March 2011 arrest

    Among Keener’s charges related to the spree were multiple counts alleging he is a “habitual offender” – a sentence enhancer with the potential to quadruple penalties. ..

    If he behaves himself, he gets paroled after 2/3rds of his sentence – in about 841 years!

    Colorado does not like habitual offenders. Last time, they gave Larry Sinclair 16 years.

    I wonder if Keeler complained that his conviction was “politically motivated” to piss off the DA? 🙂

    • Dennis says:

      1,256 years? Career criminal? Habitual offender? I understand that Fat Boy has been working hard on his posts where he practically gloats about the one-man crime wave he use to operate in Colorado as a means of attempting to intimate witnesses against him (rat on me and I’ll rat on you), but maybe he might want to rethink this idea. After all, he might want to shave a few centuries off of his sentence.

  21. Dennis says:

    BTW, I have to ask: Where’s Ilse? Thornton Parsons (aka She-Wolf of the SS) has been missing since April 13. I am going to start checking the milk cartons to see if her mug is on them.

    Tennessee State Grocery Stores

    Nationwide grocery stores.

  22. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    I was reviewing his affidavit along with the video above

    As we’ve said many times before, this has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with the facts and circumstances in this case as I know them from the information he has provided. He won’t accept that. That’s a key part of his problem as a habitual offender – it’s always someone else’s fault. This happened in 2000-2001 – long before he can claim he had anything to do with politics. His innocence or guilt isn’t going to be determined by politics. It will be determined by a jury of his peers judging his innocence or guilt based upon the facts in this case – if it even gets that far.

    I don’t care to go into the details of why but after my review this evening, he is in deep, deep shit. Anything can happen in a court case, but the odds of him prevailing on the original criminal charges seem slim to me.

    • Dennis says:

      Thanks for posting the affidavit. Long time since I looked at it. So he claims that he can prove that he was in Texas at the time of the theft because he was down there working a “job” and has the time sheets to prove it? By his own repeated admission, the only jobs he was doing during this period was drug running and human trafficking. I didn’t know they used time sheets in this line of employment. So what was he making per hour and were there any benefits (aside from the male hooker)?

      • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

        I believe he was living and working in California at B&G Delivery Systems in Sacramento, CA around 2000-2001 – where I think he claims he got hurt and went on disability (I’m fuzzy on the precision of that statement but I believe the gist is correct – it would be after he was paroled in Colorado in May 2000).

        We have him in the Fresno/Sacramento area (on and off) between roughly June 2000 to 2002 – the alleged (NCIC report) first illegal aliens arrest. We also have him in other states during that time frame.

        I don’t get the relevance to the case of where he was beyond latching on to something largely irrelevant to try to discredit her account. Because the bottom line on what is relevant is that on a particular date around then, checks made out to her got deposited into his bank account and he admits to that in his affidavit.

        • Dennis says:

          So he was in Texas working for a company that does not handle Texas? At least not according to their web site: “Founded in Chico California, B&G Delivery has been in operation since 1979 as a courier, LTL Carrier and general delivery service. B&G provides service daily to California, Nevada, Oregon, Washington and parts of Idaho, Montana and Arizona.”

          • Dennis says:

            The reason I am noting this is because a regional delivery company will be pretty restricted to its territorial due to a variety of legal issues (mostly insurance issues) and if for any reason they had to deal with something outside of their region, they would subcontract it with a regional company in that state. So what the heck was he doing in Texas? He needs an alibi for his alibi….

          • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

            No. He makes reference to timesheets from I presume the CA company to try to show he wasn’t in Texas since March 2000. But none of that smoke and bickering about dates changes the fact that he admits checks made out to her got deposited into his bank account around that time. Somehow, some way, both parties agree that happened and therefore, a bunch of this business on dates is just BS, trying to misdirect the issue publicly, mess with her credibility or cover his tracks.

            And he can’t take any of it back because it’s already in his affidavit and his book.

            It’s against the law for a Colorado court to dismiss a criminal case on the basis of a pretrial motion when the facts are in dispute. The Hungry Bottom lwayer’s 2004 motion was about as stupid as you could get from someone in his position. His 2004 motion was dead before his mother, (or whoever) he got from Mexico where he was living to help him put it together, finished typing it. In my opinion, there are more than 12 major or significant legal issues with it that I’ve seen. Anyone giving him money for his defense on the basis of what he’s said is making a real long shot bet. It’s close to a Hail Mary with arm-less receivers in the end zone right now.

    • Meesh says:

      WTPL?
      I’ve updated the main post with your observations…Too good to be buried. 🙂

  23. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    Another thing that hit me reviewing his affidavit was the hypocrisy of him complaining to the court authorities about the threats of harm and death threats directed towards him and his family. Isn’t that what he’s done to us for six years? Meesh is still getting them on this blog. So just maybe, justice is about to be done on that count. I truly hope so. His claims about us doing that back to him are as facetious as his claims against past Deputy DA Jones. Some guy threatened him on Youtube but he had nothing to do with us.

    My father nearly yanked me out of a private boys school when I was young for fighting. I absolutely couldn’t stand bullies. I was reflecting on that here some. I wasn’t big but I could take care of myself. I didn’t lose a fight.

    One thing that troubled me about it was flirting with hypocrisy. I was in effect bullying the bully to get “my way”. And because it takes two to fight, it made it less clear within the school who was on the side of right – in spite of the fact that after my first fight, I made it crystal clear why I had fought and would continue to fight if the school didn’t do something about the bullying. To some extent, we have experienced that here. Mitch alluded to it on the M&N blog not long before they shut it down.

    When you get down in the mud scrapping with a scumbag like Sinclair, you get dirty. There’s a long history and it’s not simple to explain – or I haven’t found a way to concisely explain it. It’s therefore, harder for folks on the outside to identify who is on the side of right.

    A key thing I couldn’t stand about bullies was they would pick on guys who physically couldn’t fight back – ALWAYS. To some degree, we’ve seen that with Sinclair’s threats. The people he’s really gone hard after more frequently are the women: Sheila, Lynne, Meesh, etc. I have great disdain for him for that. It sunk in about a week ago during an email exchange with Sheila. She had to look after her grandson who was home with asthma and on another day take him or another of her grandchildren to a soccer game.

    And so it bothers me that this heartless sick prick IS GOING AFTER A GRANDMOTHER! (again)

    And just maybe that’s a part of what bothers him: that a bunch of housewives and grandmothers – NOT paid Obama bloggers like he’s claimed – stood up to his threats and intimidation on their own dime and kicked his sorry ass.

    I’m so proud of you ladies. I really am.

    • Hey – you took the words right out of my mouth. 🙂

    • kstreet607 says:

      When it comes to Sinclair I made a vow to myself after he attempted to drag my daughter (who STILL doesn’t know he exists) into his mess.

      I decided to put an “S” on my chest (“Super Woman ) and go after him where it hurts…EXPOSING his sorry fat ass every way I knew how. That’s how “Sinclair Watch” came to be. 🙂

      Every time he’d say “BOO!” I’d say BRING IT, CREEP! LOL

      By the way guys…I’m just as (if not more) proud of the hard work you all are doing to expose him even more. EXPOSURE…our best weapon in defeating that scumbag.

      • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

        EXPOSURE…our best weapon in defeating that scumbag.

        The Little Cockroach Who Was Afraid of the Light

        🙂

  24. Dennis says:

    Larry Sinclair’s defense (so far – obviously still in process):
    1. Carmen Segura is no damn good.
    2. They owed money to Mexican drug dealers and were not in a good position to be found with those checks.
    3. Carmen Segura is no damn good.
    4. They owed him money for lots of things (the list keeps growing).
    5. Carmen Segura is no damn good.
    6. He wasn’t even in town when the checks some how magically appeared in his bank account. In fact, he was in Texas with that no good Carmen Segura who set him up with a male hooker just for the heck of it.
    7. They also owed him money from that trip to Texas.
    8. Carmen Segura is no…you got the drill.

    So his defense is that he had the motive (they owed him money); he had the opportunity (he and Carmen were spending lots of time together so it seems); most likely he had the means and it doesn’t matter if he was in town or not because there are many ways to drop some checks into an account. So aside from serving the case to the DA on a sliver platter, where is the defense? Even if Carmen Segura is no damn good (which I have no way of knowing), it just doesn’t matter. Even if they all owed him a ton of money, theft is still theft so it just doesn’t matter.

    So the only question I have for the accused regarding his defense: That male hooker, was he any good?

  25. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    So the only question I have for the accused regarding his defense: That male hooker, was he any good?

    In his next fictional book, “When one man bends over alone”, he’ll finally reveal the “real” political motivation behind this 2001 charge: he was cut, kinky and it was George W Bush! 🙂

  26. Dennis says:

    I think I just found Fat Boy’s next attorney

  27. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    Sinclair’s 2004 Affidavit claims he didn’t know about the warrant until 2004. The docket says “Arrest Date: 2001-05-08” and his affidavit certainly attests that he knew the victim had some sort of a major financial problem with him in 2001. But let’s ignore that for now and play along with his spin. As Sinclair would know, lots of cases get resolved without going to trial. He was in no danger expediting resolution of this matter until he had to physically show up – particularly if he was truly innocent.

    And he proved that when the “Slanderous Kook” sued Barack Obama in MN
    http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/slanderous-kook-im-slander-victim
    and when he sued the three bloggers for defamation
    http://www.dmlp.org/threats/sinclair-v-tubesocktedd
    and when he defended himself from Parisi against defamation DC case# 1:10-cv-00897-RJL and
    Appeals Court Cases #s 10-7077 & No. 11-7135

    To come out publicly as he did in Jan 2008, he must have felt pretty confident in his own personal safety because everyone quickly found out where he lived in Duluth, MN.

  28. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    I guess he didn’t “live up” to “Defendant is terminally ill” claimed in his 2004 affidavit. He discussed growth of the tumor in his radio interviews in 2008 – implying malignancy. He maintained that he had forgone treatment for it (surgery, chemo or radiation) and is just letting it take it’s course. Now, we don’t know the type of tumor but I was looking at the prognosis for a wide variety of them. They talk about % of folks who manage to survive 5-10 years generally (a higher percentage tend not to survive). But those percentages are typically based upon the vast majority of patients accepting the best available treatment options. The odds of surviving a “terminally ill” diagnosis of a brain tumor without any treatment AND no obvious sign of health degradation after 10 years have to be pretty darn slim. In other words, I don’t think it’s unfair to say, in the wake of all his BS, such a claim smells real bad of more BS.

    I have a feeling that isn’t going to go over too well when he goes for mitigating health issues during the sentencing phase of this case (should it get there). Because he’s already received at least 10 years of relief for that very probable BS by evading the warrant.

    He looked scared shitless in his recent video. Such an excuse as “terminally ill”, if bogus pr misleading (as it certainly seems to some significant extent), suggests he’s been really scared of this case for a long, long time.

    • Dennis says:

      Of course we should remember that some years ago he popped up claiming that he had received a mysterious miracle cure for his brain tumor at some clinic in Mexico. So he now denies having it. OTOH, the ER and mental health clinic in West Virginia (where he had his “vacation” a few years ago) had been listed as HIV+. Again he denied it and talked as if he was going to take legal action against everybody in WV. Nothing happened except that he produced a highly dubious report from an STD clinic claiming that he was HIV-. But there are so many illnesses out there, I’m sure he can come up with something.

      • Meesh says:

        YEH last year he also claimed that he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes…wonder how that’s going? I guess he must have gone to Mexico for another miracle cure. 🙄

        Larry Sinclair “My birthday Carvel cake.”
        on September 28, 2013 at 12:12pm

        • Dennis says:

          He looks a lot like some lunatic I once saw in a fast food joint just outside of Mansfield, Ohio. The guy was wearing much the same “style” and was having a loud (and very loosing) argument with his salt and pepper shakers.

      • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

        Dennis:
        Of course we should remember that some years ago he popped up claiming that he had received a mysterious miracle cure for his brain tumor at some clinic in Mexico. So he now denies having it.

        If you look at the transcripts of all his radio interviews we did up to July 2008 and the copy of his site until June 2008, he maintains his brain tumor still afflicts him with no mention of a cure. In an interview (I think) later that fall I heard recently (Rense I think), he maintains the tumor “hadn’t grown much in the last six months”. Around the time of his June 2008, press conference, he says he offered a list of his doctors to confirm it but only to media members he approved of. Nobody in the media we know of said they saw the list or communicated with his doctors to confirm it.

        He claimed Crewdson did but I never saw confirmation of that from Crewdson and Crewdson recently called him “a nut”.

        You’d think through all of that, since he hadn’t been in Mexico during that time or since, that he’d have mentioned the Mexico cure. It sounds like another one of his deceptions where’s he got carried away and can’t keep his BS straight.

        Maybe he “bought” a diagnosis from a Mexican “doctor” in 2004 to help him with the 2001 warrant .. ??? And the “real cure” is he never had it in the first place.

  29. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    9 Days since any update on Sinclair News
    In the month of April, only two articles appeared that were not written by Sinclair.
    If we stop visiting it, it will be all but dead statistically.
    It appears that his early April promise of a three part series within a day or two on “When Politics Turn Facts into Fiction, and Fiction into Facts” has has been broken like so many of his previous promises.
    The mad dog has been muzzled by his lawyer.

    “I’d actually take much more satisfaction in seeing him dribble back into the pathetic nothing he was before this whole thing started.” Paul Day, July 29th, 2008

    Looks like Paul Day can “take much more satisfaction”.

    • Dennis says:

      I’m sure that his attorney has told him to zip it. But I don’t think that will last long. They say that he who lives by the mouth shall die by the mouth and that boy has one big fat mouth…so we shall wait him out.

      • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

        In Delaware, 2008, he had Rense and other fringe, tinhatter media soothing his narcissistic ego howling “POLITICAL PRISONER!!” – letting him pretend for a fleeting moment that he was somehow important. He had his “followers” clicking a Paypal button on his site to finance their slim, ever fading hopes against a winning candidate.

        Now? The silence is deafening. He keeps trying to drift back and cling to political motives to explain his pathetic circumstance. But all that reveals is the unreliable sick thinking caused by his chronic mental illness and the real politics of his efforts: almost nobody is around who gives a shit about him because he failed at all they ever really wanted from him – politically – to keep the N-word out of office. Many used him as a willing conduit for their hatred of The Black Man – not for anything that was based upon fair reasoning, real evidence and facts. Not because they ever really liked him. They never really cared about him and probably had great disdain for his criminal career and lifestyle. But they held their noses for the only thing they really cared more about: the sick snake oil he was selling that might help them achieve their political desire. The only one he really successfully duped in this process was himself into believing he was someone who mattered.

        And so we’re still here, committed to our cause and they’re almost all gone. All his cries of “Wolf!”and irrational, deluded claims of “Political Motivation” bring back this time is the dim echo of his lonely weak voice. All the few left see now is another lie of his exposed: that Colorado wasn’t ever going to dismiss this case.

        Unlike Paul Day, my satisfaction would come if I get to dance to the music of his clinking chains being led out of a Colorado court room to a lengthy habitual offender sentence that I think he truly deserves for all the anxiety, pain, suffering and heavy cost he’s had on the American society he tried to scam.

        • Dennis says:

          All true. You may remember that a few years ago he posed the question: Is Larry Sinclair Still Relevant? He is obviously getting his answer. Even the extreme nutters are ignoring him. Except for his snorting, the silence is deafening. Of course he should have expected this. Any scam has a short shelf life and any intelligent con man always knows when it is time to move on. But not StinkButt. Nope, he dug himself in deep and has no way to dig himself back out. At least prison will give him free room and board for the rest of his life.

          • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

            “Well, to be honest with you, it’s not so much as to whether you believe me or not, as much as you hear me.”
            Larry Sinclair, June, 2008

            Tell that to the judge and jury you dumb sociopath!

          • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

            He’s sold his book copyright so his motivation to continue to make money from this scam is significantly diminished. His news site has failed financially to deliver much revenue. At some point, it will dawn on him that he needs to find a new way of scamming money and the spotlight we have on him curtails him from doing so in the lucrative ways he enjoyed moving drugs and illegal aliens.

            Maybe he’s already going in a new direction towards skimming money from charities.

            If he stays out of jail, I think he’ll try to go underground and drift back to the more lucrative crimes and money he enjoyed while continuing to collect his SSDI.

            It’s tougher now because the Secret Service, who will continue to protect Obama for the rest of his life after he leaves office, can never take their eyes entirely off him. I doubt law enforcement like FBI agent Henly will either. They know it’s just a matter of time before he comes up with another scheme or meltdown.

        • “[A]most nobody is around who gives a shit about him because he failed at all they ever really wanted from him – politically – to keep the N-word out of office. …. .”

          Man, WTPL? you really get it! That’s what caught my attention more than anything else. It was immediately obvious to me when I first saw his video that the jerk was lying and that he was expertly manipulating and exploiting racism for profit. But what surprised even cynical ME was that after it should have been clear to everyone that his story was a sick con job, his audience clung to it nevertheless like they would a t.v. show fantasy that they enjoyed. They knew it was a lie but it would have been so nice if it were true that they said “what the heck, let’s just go with the fantasy.” Thus, the closeted gay crack user ACCUSATION was enough to justify the hate which was actually sourced in his skin color and his “uppityness”. As a result, even today there are snide remarks on the internet referencing Obama’s “homosexuality” and “crack use” long after everyone has forgotten or couldn’t care less about the source of that story. Joe “You Lie!” Wilson could get away with his outburst partly because indeed there were enough doubts about Obama’s past that many of his supporters wouldn’t go too far out on a limb with their outrage. And on top of that was the “birther” controversy that helped to continue to feed those who were hungry for a justification for their hatred. So while the story couldn’t “keep the N-word OUT of office. …. .” it nevertheless gave his opponents an imaginary reason to “treat him like a N-word” while he was IN office.

          Bottom line is I would be very happy and eager to see him sit in jail well into the 2030’s, with a sore butt, contemplating what he accomplished and asking himself whether it was all worth it. I might even write him letters. 🙂

          • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

            It’s probably unfair to paint that whole group with a broad brush. Some of them came to their senses when they realized he was lying and defected. Some of them were as crazy or crazier than Sinclair was – for example, “Stay Safe” Citizen Wells is still looking for Big Foot and he’s one fucked up in the head dude. That guy has some mental issues too – he might be sicker than Larry.

            But there’s absolutely no doubt in my mind, in spite of Larry’s BS protests to the contrary, that group had a very strong constituency of hard core racists.

            And we some of that same faction at Plains Radio – Ed Hale’s show.

            Larry’s true stance was that as long as you clicked that Paypal button, he didn’t really care.

  30. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    http://www.amazon.com/Barack-Obama-Larry-Sinclair-Cocaine-ebook/dp/B002PSD322/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1397603862&sr=1-1&keywords=barack+obama+and+larry+sinclair

    The Book rights have been sold to Movie Skool LLC and will be offered via Amazon Kindle under their name and copyright which became effective on May 1, 2014.

    Movie Skool LLC
    http://www.wysk.com/index/california/los-angeles/uy3fy9p/movie-skool-llc/officers
    http://www.wysk.com/index/california/los-angeles/uy3fy9p/movie-skool-llc/profile

    http://www.bizapedia.com/ca/MOVIE-SKOOL-LLC.html
    The Registered Agent on file for this company is Kenneth Olsen and is located at 180-6333 W 3rd St Los Angeles, CA 90048. The company’s principal address is 6230 Wilshire #1234 Los Angeles, CA 90048.

    http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=http://www.movieskool.com/&hl=en

    What is the current listing status for movieskool.com?
    Site is listed as suspicious – visiting this web site may harm your computer.

    Part of this site was listed for suspicious activity 6 time(s) over the past 90 days.

    What happened when Google visited this site?
    Of the 11 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 9 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2014-05-07, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on 2014-04-30.
    This site was hosted on 1 network(s) including AS26496 (26496-GO-DADDY-COM-LLC).

    So I didn’t visit the site.

    ‘The Rehearsal’
    Movie Skool LLC is casting “The Rehearsal,” and independent musical comedy feature which focuses on the struggles of artists in the music industry. Kenneth Olsen, prod./writer.
    Shoots April-June in L.A., Long Beach, Las Vegas, and NY.
    Seeking—Musical Individuals and Bands: males and females, 18-66+, acts of all types, improvisational and musical skills are a plus.
    Email contact info, pix, and/or links and showcase details to production@lowbudgetfeature.com.
    For more info, visit http://www.lowbudgetfeature.com.
    Deferred pay contingent upon sale. Credit and meals provided.
    Contact Information:
    Website: http://www.lowbudgetfeature.com
    Casting Notice Details:
    Categories: Nonunion Film
    Production Personnel: Kenneth Olsen, prod./writer.

    It’s a young, small company. “Lowbudgetfeature” should tell you something. The business address looks like it’s in a strip mall.??

    In the above production (only one I’ve seen), they don’t have the money/budget to pay actors except on contingency for this project.

    And that’s probably part of Sinclair’s compensation for his book – contingency if it goes into production.

    No way Sinclair got much money from this group. Probably just enough to get the first part of a retainer covered. ($5 k or less would be my guess – but that’s a guess)

    • Dennis says:

      Ok, we have just entered my professional zone. Have not checked out the web site because the link sets off every web security system that I use. Olsen has very dubious film industry credentials (as in none). He seems to be mostly engaged in running web sites (most of which are malware infected) while operating some very fly-by-night “movie” companies. His business address appears to be a mail drop box on Wilshire Blvd. He has virtually no web presence, either personally or professionally. These are all very, very bad signs. Professionally, everything I am coming up with strongly suggests some type of scam artist. Unfortunately, his set up is basically “legal” in the industry. But it is very dubious in every possible sense.

    • Dennis says:

      Exploring further, the guy runs a small collection of wing nutter anti-Obama stuff on YouTube and the web. Olsen did a online anti-Obama movie with Jack Cashill, major wing nutter with WND. Lots of fringe of the fringe stuff. Total nutter with some highly dubious sounding Movieskool Academy (?) where he “teaches.” From what I can assess, I assume that the guy is either jerking Fat Boy around on the money or he is acting as a front for some one else. His own operation is pretty low and highly dubious. As part of my real job, I have to make evaluations of media companies. This chap flunks every question I use in such evaluations. He is a perfect fit for Lardo. I can’t wait for the explosions over this one.

      • Meesh says:

        Heh I wonder if this was one of the guys that he met up with when he went to California…to “eat” people…(I guess Olsen got away)

        2014/01/08 “Heading back to Florida after a whirlwind 72 hours of lunches, dinners, interview and conversations in California. There ate many in California who are concerned about the direction our nation is headed.”

        A few days later he was bitching about something, that he had been interviewed or was suppose to….

        “…they will agree to do interviews and after you have gone through all the necessary scheduling hurdles and setting up for live interviews they change their mind at the eleventh hour, not because their position has changed but instead because some political insider threatens to not cover them if they do the interview.”

        • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

          “… not because their position has changed but instead because some political insider threatens to not cover them if they do the interview.”

          Because the “political insider” found out what most in the GOP, the mainstream media, most folks on the internet and we found out: that what he was spinning was pure bullshit.

          • Meesh says:

            He claims he wasn’t important enough…Yeh back in January somebody broke his heart…

            “Over the past year Conservative groups have beat the blame the media horse to death yet when offered the opportunity to have their side of the story told in their own words they stick their noses up in the air and tell you, you aren’t important enough. They want you to cover their events and publish their press releases but they don’t want to answer your questions or even respond to interview requests.”

            After his trip to California, he was extremely “bitchy” I thought it was indigestion from eating people. 🙂

            • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

              They found out what so many found out about him and is revealed in reading his own posts: he cannot accurately join the dots in stories. His recent story on past Deputy DA Jones we examined is a classic example.

              It’s tough enough for anyone with good media to try to communicate it in a way that they get the story right. There’s no way one could rely on Sinclair because he’s simply terrible at it. The risks of any involvement with him heavily outweight the rewards.

  31. Dennis says:

    Final note. Not only does Olsen have a very low web presence (which is basically unheard of for any active indie filmmaker), but what few web sites he has are pretty much nonfunctional. Likewise, his claim of film experience is about zilch. His only credit on the IMDb is from the late 1980s when he was a crew person on a short video with Pauly Shore. This guy doesn’t even come up to the Edward Wood level of filmmaking. This deal is sounding even better than I would have hoped. Oh wee. Ironically, the last filmmaker to deal with Lardo was actually for real. Sure, he was mostly experienced in sports documentaries and I have no idea what possessed him to go briefly chasing after Fatso, but he was for real.

  32. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    Yes, I would stay away from his sites. Doesn’t matter anyway that I can see. He looks like a small maybe one man outfit who makes/made his living by operating a small mac consulting business and offbeat websites. And now he’s tinkering with other stuff like productions or books. He’ll now collect the trickle of royalties from Larry’s book.

  33. Meesh says:

    New display background picture on FaceBook

    “My Aunt and Uncle insisted I get in the picture, I say it would have looked much better without me. lol “

    Here’s his profile picture

    “Don’t let that sweet face fool you, behind that semi smile lived a devil in disguise. — with Mary Grasmick, Robin Sinclair, Shanon Sinclair, Sandi Arenge LoBue and Diane Jensen.”

    • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

      “Don’t let that sweet face fool you, behind that semi smile lived a devil in disguise.”

      Hey, he actually said something honest and true … well the latter part of the sentence … !! 🙂

  34. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    I did a little research on an old, tired point Larry has frequently raised: that somehow, we were a part of Obama’s 400 bloggers. I never saw any evidence of that so I thought I’d check the story.

    I did a google search for “Obama campaign” and “400 bloggers” between Jan 2007 and Jan 2009
    https://www.google.ca/search?q=obama+campaign+hires+400+bloggers+2008&rlz=1C2VEAD_enCA409CA455&biw=1024&bih=635&sa=X&ei=P9BqU6OPEpCpyATSw4GQDg&ved=0CBsQpwUoBg&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A1%2F1%2F2007%2Ccd_max%3A1%2F1%2F2009&tbm=#q=%22obama+campaign%22+%22400+bloggers%22&tbs=cdr:1%2Ccd_min:1%2F1%2F2007%2Ccd_max:1%2F1%2F2009
    It didn’t turn up anything.

    So I traced the Democratic Underground thread Larry referenced during his June 2008 press conference and put on his site larrysinclair.org
    http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132×5990249
    It says “According to Fox News, so question the source, but posted on Hillbuzz: …”

    So I went to Hillbuzz (GOP biased)
    http://hillbuzz.org/obama-hires-400-new-bloggers-to-sway-hillary-supporters
    It says

    Apparently, according to FOX News (EDITED TO CLARIFY: FOX News information scroll running during FOX News broadcast, NOT FOXNews.com), the Obama campaign has hired 400 bloggers to influence the public discourse and sway Hillary voters to “remember we are all Democrats”, to give up Clinton’s cause, and to become dutiful citizens of the Obama Nation.

    Also, it’s been noted by several HillBuzz readers, that Obama volunteers are being told to ratchet down the anti-Hillary hate, because someone in the campaign realizes Hillary Clinton supporters are not very likely to support Obama if he becomes the nominee.

    HillBuzz firmly believes Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic nominee …

    So the whole story was uncertain according to something someone at HillBuzz, a GOP slanted blog, thinks they saw on a ticker at FOX News – not a story (and not the most reliable news source … except maybe for all things slanted GOP).

    So the whole allegation about the Obama campaign hiring “400 bloggers” was based upon the flimsiest of news sources – nothing official turns up anywhere.

    I’d always wondered where the F that came from.

    • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

      One other thing about that report. It was dated May 15th, 2008. We’d been on Larry’s case individually for months, Larry’s lawsuit against the 3 bloggers was about 2-3 months old and M&N had been going at least six weeks. The whole allegation was just more flimsy Sinclair BS.

    • I do remember Legion complaining about “The 400 Bloggers” and me wondering where the hell he came up with that. But since it sounded like something out of “The Charge of The Light Brigade” it did have dramatic appeal so I kinda went with the idea. After all it embodied the way I felt about Obama’s campaign at the time.

      • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

        Further to our exchange above on the N-word theme of a bunch of Sinclair’s group, I came across this 2008 blog I hadn’t seen today:

        He’s speculating about Ben’s Smith’s (Politico) reaction to Sinclair’s blog
        http://mpandgs.blogspot.ca/2008/06/sinclair-and-his-criminal-past-gets-msm.html

        Being familiar with that blog, I wonder about Smith’s impressions as he reviewed comments about “teabagging,” the ghetto,” “Planet of the Apes” (among numerous other monkey references), Obama selling “Kenyan fried chicken,” “hilarious” YouTube videos about “watermelons,” and hopes that someone puts “the [redacted] in a hole.” These are among the less offensive comments left by Sinclair’s regular supporters who are funding his journeys between Washington DC and Minnesota. Sinclair does moderate his blog, and he evidently finds such commentary appropriate. You might think that someone craving msm attention–someone who wants his story taken seriously–would be more circumspect in what he includes on his private blog (it’s called “audience awareness”). It’s highly possible that Sinclair’s blog will do more to discredit him than anything else (well, excepting the criminal history).

        In fairness to Sinclair, he did get rid of some of the most flagrant racist epithets and scolded them for it but moderating that group completely of that disgrace would have been a full time 24/7 job. Racism was too deeply ingrained – at the core of the motives of many of them. Sadly, it seems there are a group in Congress who don’t seem to feel much different on the subject. They just aren’t as blatantly obvious when they discuss it.

        • “Racism was too deeply ingrained – at the core of the motives of many of them. Sadly, it seems there are a group in Congress who don’t seem to feel much different on the subject. They just aren’t as blatantly obvious when they discuss it.”

          King Cotton increased America’s world wide wealth and power exponentially during the 18th and 19th centuries resulting in an American “culture” and perception of reality created involuntarily by my unpaid cotton picking ancestors and rooted in the very racism that continues to infect this country’s politics today. The major difference now is that there are limits on how that racism may be acceptably expressed.

          That being said, I still never forget that all Americans are victims of that racist culture and that many White Americans have fought against it from America’s earliest beginnings, ultimately bleeding and dying to end it in the deadliest war America has ever experienced. But the power of all that wealth that was acquired over the centuries from slave labor nevertheless produced some warped thinking among Americans when it came to employer-employee relationships. Paid employees looking for fair treatment started out at a distinct disadvantage when the default boss-worker relationship was master-slave. So America’s workers got off to a terrible start and some of America’s “bosses” are still using racism to their advantage but to the detriment of all other Americans.

  35. Dennis says:

    400 Bloggers? Is this like the 300 Spartans? So what’s our motto: “Go stranger and tell Sparta that we 400 have kicked the fat bastards ass off”?

    • “Is this like the 300 Spartans?”

      I was thinking “rode the six hundred” but you’ve got the idea.

      • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

        democratista, Make Noise, Gilligan, Meesh, Sheila, Lynne … housewives and grandmothers so tenacious and formidable … Sinclair repeatedly describes them to the media as … (… wait for it …) … “Internet Warriors” 🙂

        On that point, in the face of all the threats, lawsuits and intimidation, it’s hard to disagree with him. 🙂

  36. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    Morning thought: I was looking over this March 20, 2008 letter by Sibley to the credit card company
    https://theregulatortoo.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/citibank.pdf
    Meesh and I never saw a response.

    There’s no way a credit card company ignores a lawyers letter like that. No chance.

    Sibley & Sinclair were together three months after that letter so there was lots of time to get a response and expedite it for the Press Conference June 18th, 2008.

    Sibley wasn’t a good lawyer as his suspension reinforces and also a little crazy – talking about the size of his dick at a press conference. But he knew his client desperately needed evidence. That letter supports that and that Sibley got right on it when he got involved with Sinclair – trying to get evidence to support his client.

    If they got a response that the information couldn’t be provided, Sinclair would have pinned it up. We know that was always his MO. Anything in his favor – always publish it because he historically had so little to otherwise show people.

    Six years later, maybe a moot point given where we are but for new folks looking in, what struck me as further damning reading that letter is that his own lawyer understood the need for that evidence, went after that evidence three months before the Press Conference … and he too came up empty handed at the Press Conference. Like Pulitzer Prize winning reporter John Crewdson who spent five days with Sinclair, Sinclair’s own lawyer with access to everything his client would have access to, saw the need for evidence months in advance, like Crewdson needed to support his potential article that without evidence he could never write, and Sibley too couldn’t find a shred of evidence to substantiate his client’s claims in front of a press conference in the court of public opinion.

    Under great scrutiny, both Sibley and Crewdson proved it’s difficult to prove something happened when the reality is that it did not.

    • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

      A little more on this:
      “Waiting on credit card statements from Citigroup so that when I do give the clubs name I give the correct name…and Citigroup has confirmed that they can get them for us, it’s just going to take them a little bit of time.”
      Sinclair, Jan 23, 2008 Radio Interview by Jeff Rense about a week after the first allegation

      Two months before Sibley’s letter which makes no mention of Sinclair’s prior request above. And nearly five months before the Press Conference in June 2008 that delivered nothing.

      “I have said to the best of my recollection, the name of the bar was Alibis. I did not even want to say that much until i got my credit card receipt, uhh statements back from Citigroup which we have requested almost what, four months now? ”
      Sinclair, Jul 16, 2008 Radio Interview by Hal Turner a month after the June Press Conference, six months after the first allegation and six months after he said Citigroup confirmed they could provide them.

      This was one of many broken promises of providing evidence and a witness.

      Now more than six years later… still no witnesses and still no credible evidence = NOTHING other than a long list of deceptions or debunked crap, etc

      And some poor deluded loser just paid for the copyright to that BS.

  37. kstreet607 says:

    WTPL…you make excellent points in your comment. I’m guessing that’s why Sinclair was so vicious with the opposition. He tried to intimidate any and everyone who didn’t believe his story and for those of us who went a step further…in connecting the dots…he went ballistic! Your comment above simplifies everything into one neat package.

    The creep had nothing…PERIOD! His gullible supporters’ hate for Obama (pre-election) was nothing short of HYSTERICAL. Fats gave them just what they needed…”hope”. Hope to stop the Black guy in his tracks.

    What’s so ironic is that the idiot keeps trying to find ways of scamming people, this time, based on his past claims. But I’m not sure many (outside of his family) are buying what he’s selling at this point.

  38. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    “The creep had nothing…PERIOD! ”

    For the benefit of new folks dropping by, he did provide this Hotel Points statement claiming it was evidence in Feb 2008:

    On the run from the FBI raid in Laredo as of Apr-Aug 2007 allegedly for smuggling illegal aliens and from the Delaware police for counterfeit money orders as of Oct 2007, Sinclair settled in Duluth around Dec 2007. So we know from the address on that statement of 1999 Hotel activity that this statement was a very recently generated attempt to support his Jan 2008 allegations.

    A few severe problems with it were:
    1. The activity dates of Nov 3-6 only represented stays during the evenings of Nov 3rd to 5th – which do not cover the time he claimed to be with Obama: evenings of Nov 6-7
    2. The activity dates were out of order – odd on a statement broken with weeks of no activity
    3. The August and September activity dates in the details do not match the range of activity dates requested to generate the form (on the upper part of the form): “10/01/99 to 12/31/99”
    Choice Hotels couldn’t explain to me how #3 could happen on this form nor the odd order of the dates in point #2. This form looked like it had been subjected to some kind forgery coming from a guy who had spent about half his adult life in jail for … forgery/theft/deception.

    Probably panicked that his apparently forged “evidence” proved he wasn’t in Chicago when he said he was and he needed it to fall within the dates of his claimed liaison with Obama (Nov 6-7 evenings), he came back with this Mar 2008 letter:

    that crossed out “While I can’t authenticate any information you currently have in your possession”:

    and it appears that he tried to add this claim for 1480 points for the evenings of Nov 6-7:

    claiming he had extended his stay, to this credit of 2220 points:

    but the 2220 points representing evenings of Nov 3-5 are the only points that appear on his original statement published in Feb 2008 for activity from Oct-Dec 1999:

    When I queried the woman at Choice Privileges about this in 2008, she agreed that this second set of points looked to have been recently added and that if a customer whines about an error going way back, they don’t bicker with their customer and just add them – as the no invoice codes on the second set of points indicate was done.

    Independent of my investigation, a private investigator looked into this and concluded similarly “We do not find evidence of Mr. Sinclair’s stay at the Comfort Suites. These statements appear to be a well crafted forgery, where Mr. Sinclair has convinced the hotel company to add his hotel points so that he could use the statements for alternative purposes.”

    This was the only circumstantial documentation evidence he provided attempting to directly support his allegations against President Obama. And he never provided any witnesses or anything else to directly back up his story. On top of his multiple felony convictions resulting in roughly 16 years in jail for forgery/deception/theft, the only evidence these documents provided to me, along with all the many other lies/deceptions we caught him in, is that he simply isn’t very good at forgery/deception.

    I suggest that if the folks in Colorado who seem to be dropping by now and then take a close look at all the evidence in that forgery/theft case, they may well find a similar conclusion. I guess in the coming weeks or months, one way or the other, we’re all going to find out.

  39. tjtaygee says:

    I cannot imagine GoFundMe would be happy to know that liar-larr is [allegedly] fraudulently listing the rights to the book as a $10,000/Platinum “reward” while at the same time claiming on Amazon that he has already sold the rights to the book.
    Nevermind that it could be evidence before the current case pending in CO – often-times prior history is not admissible – but this particular bit of [alleged] fraud is current, not prior, no?

    I’m the one doing all the alleging. It looks like fraud to me, but I am not a lawyer…

  40. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    This interview from 2013 was reposted today and promoted on Twitter today
    http://jmhradio.blogspot.ca/2014/05/lawrence-sinclair-on-jenny-hatch-radio.html?spref=tw

    https://twitter.com/BlogMomMagazine

    She promotes him here as well
    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/jennyhatchradio/2013/08/09/lawrence-sinclair-on-the-jenny-hatch-show

    Near the end of the interview, just before the 40 minute mark, Sinclair makes the argument that the only reason the Colorado DA office is keeping the Colorado warrant active is for political favor with the Obama administration so that these ambitious individuals at the Colorado DA office can be rewarded (effectively quid pro quo)

    Here’s the transcript starting at around the 39:00 minute mark:

    “You mention Colorado.

    Colorado is a good example of what I have been put through as far as targeted.

    There is a outstanding warrant out of Pueblo county, Colorado that’s been there since 2001. I’ve not been running from it. I’ve acknowledged it. In fact, I was in communication with the District Attorney’s office and the court trying to deal with it.

    In 2008, the Chief Deputy District Attorney Jim Corsey who was the individual who was handling the case specifically told me “Do not worry about it. Do not waste the money and the time for coming out to Colorado because i’m going to move to have it dismissed anyway.

    Because of all of the internet warriors. These people started contacting the District Attorney’s office and the Sheriff’s department.Even Crime Stoppers. Crime Stoppers in Pueblo Colorado and it’s director ah had to call me and apologize to me because people had taken information from them and put it into postcards and started sending it to my neighbors and my property manager and represented the postcards as being mailed by Crime Stoppers when in fact it was mailed by some idiot in Denver. Because they were all post marked in Denver.

    That’s what I’m saying. People don’t bother to get their information. And they start calling. And of course, they all want to do it anonymously because God forbid you’d ever be able to hold them accountable.

    But this case was taken from the Chief Deputy District Attorney and given to one of his subordinates who himself has political aspirations to be the DA one day and who happened to have been a big Obama supporter.

    So here we are in 2013 and the warrant still sits there. It’s only valid within the state of Colorado. But not because there’s any reason to proceed with it, but none other than he wants to be able to not have it used against him when he decides to run for DA – that people find out “oh well he’s the one who dropped this thing”

    You know, and these are things I still live with every single day.”

    The interview is riddled with incorrect fats, overstatements, deceptions, etc as usual.

    So Sinclair’s lawyer may have asked for silence but that hasn’t stopped one of his buddies from getting the word out on the Colorado case tonight in their radio broadcast.

    Larry may well find out in Colorado how much BS crap like the above – particularly when it’s false and impugns the good character of these public servants- is not appreciated in the Colorado DA’s office. I hope so.

    • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

      I made a typo above, the 38:00 minute mark is where the transcript starts.

    • Meesh says:

      Hmmm Jenny Hatch can tweet all what she wants with 25 followers on Twitter… (the majority is beauty soaps/bath stuff) a “BlogMomMagazine “???! (worse than FatBoy) A carrier pigeon in a snowstorm would have better luck getting her word out…

      Just sayin’ 🙄

      • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

        She did claim, and I expect it’s probably like Larry’s claims, that she was getting 40,000 visitors to her blog previously. And the audio/link page is up on a few websites beyond twitter. But it may well be a poor man’s Plains Radio. 🙂

        • Meesh says:

          She has followed FatBoy’s story since (late 2008) or early 2009…Jenny came in as a “self-professed psychopath” at the time she had a really wild BIO…(too much information)
          I guess from day one there was a magnetic attraction between the two *idiots*. Ed Hale and Citizen Wells seemed fairly normal within comparison to Jenny Hatch.She’s NUTZ!

    • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

      I’ve been listening to this whack-job for six years (on & off). To hear him chalk up in that interview the attention he received from the Secret Service (for all his threats to the Obamas (faxing bullet riddled photos, etc) and White House Staff), the attention he received in Delaware for cashing counterfeit money orders, etc as just politically motivated abuse of power retribution … still is a little breathtaking. He remains a seriously deluded serial liar. And he’s never going to stop doing it to get whatever he needs.

  41. Dennis says:

    Breaking news footage of SinkLiar waiting outside the courtroom for his hearing

  42. kstreet607 says:

    What I noticed about the “interview” is that Sinclair never mentions his initial allegations about sex with Obama in a limo, Donald Young contacting HIM and other outrageous lies he has told in order to elicit money from his “sicko-phants”.

    • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

      It wasn’t the first interview between those two and per her introduction, she’d been following Sinclair for years so I think that’s why they never had to go through the initial allegations.

      I did take some satisfaction with this quote by him:

      That’s what I’m saying. People don’t bother to get their information. And they start calling.

      First of all it’s a contradiction: people calling is people bothering to get their information … and verifying it.

      But the tone of and pause after his painful expression “And they start calling …” was fun. Again, he’s a hypocrite. He spews his delusional conclusions from the sparse, unverified information (lies) he’s cobbled together to try to get donations. He’s troubled that we don’t take him at his word and that we go out to get real verified information that proves he’s full of shit.

  43. kstreet607 says:

    Question: Did Sinclair purge all the videos of him making those allegations against then State Sen. Barack Obama?

    Update: I just researched the internet and found that at least one does exist…

  44. Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

    Happy Mother’s Day to the “Internet Warrior” Mothers and Grandmothers who exposed and thumped the con man 🙂

  45. Dennis says:

    Yesterday must have indeed been Mother’s Day since the biggest mother herself, Ilse, has finally returned. Yet another looney rant filled with “factually false” statements, crazy distortions, and just plain gibberish as she continues her wild goosestep to a different drummer. I use to take her almost seriously enough to waste time correcting her silly assertions, but Ilse has jumped the shark in so many ways it just isn’t worth the effort. Odd thing, she appears to be totally ignoring the current legal situation of her lover boy. I kind of suspect that in her unforgiving universe, Fat Boy may be on his own.

    • Where's The Proof, Larry? says:

      Indeed. “No Rule of Law for Liberals” is the article title on a site run by a career con man.

  46. Dennis says:

    As of today, the “GoFuckMe” fund drive is holding steady at $500. OK, it’s only $14,500 short of its goal and it doesn’t look as if anything has happened for quite a while. Meanwhile, the YouTube viewer clicks for his whiny fund pitch has attracted about 73, quite a few being those of us who peeked in for cheap laughs. With the exception of the occasional posts by Ilse (based on when she gets the booze flowing), the Snooze site is more quiet than most graveyards. I guess his attorney has really slapped him down about opening his fat trap. Poor Lardo must be totally steaming by now. At some point, he is going to blow….

    • “I guess his attorney has really slapped him down about opening his fat trap. Poor Lardo must be totally steaming by now.”

      I’m wondering whether his attorney listens to him with a straight face and why he would risk his reputation arguing that this fat little devil is a victim of Obama. Something’s rotten in Denver.

  47. In the last 30 plus days, only one story has been provided by someone other than FatBoy. I wonder if the theme audio when one clicks the “donate” button is the sound of crickets …

  48. Dennis says:

    Since Fat Boy often likes to “borrow” his material, I think I just found the model for his next “defense”: http://www.salon.com/2014/05/21/the_rights_favorite_criminal_inside_the_hopeless_obsession_with_dinesh_dsouza/

  49. Dennis says:

    What appears to be the first version of his defense part two has just appeared. Sort of. It is one long paragraph of rambling nonsense about him and his lover boy Ramon going to a Denver football game in September 1999. Random accusation that the staff at the Adam’s Mark hotel in Denver used racial profiling. Then the whole post just stops (like maybe he passed out from the vodka or something). Presumably it will vanish soon as he has to rethink and respin before moving on. Hope Fat Boy’s lawyer is awake, because I suspect that Lardo is starting to buck at the “say nothing” concept.

    • SicLiar has probably been made aware by his lawyer that going to trial and fighting habitual offender sentencing in Colorado (arguably a lost cause if convicted) will cost more legal dough upfront. So maybe he’s got to try to put more out there on his website to try to stimulate Paypal or GoFundMe handouts to fund his increased legal fees or maybe all he had was enough dough to start legal representation and he needs more for it to continue.

      With only 82 views (many of which would be by us), his video to beg for money isn’t doing very well.

      Of course, he could always contact that mysterious “unknown Asian female” from New Jersey that helped send him counterfeit money orders for no reason he would divulge to the Delaware police ….

    • Here it is in case he deletes it:

      Fiction, and Fiction into Facts Part II of III
      May 22, 2014
      By Lawrence Sinclair
      Labor Day weekend 1999 was going to be a special one indeed for myself, Ramon and as it turned out, Juan. Ramon was a rabid Jerry Rice and San Francisco 49er’s fan and the 49er’s just happened to be playing the Denver Broncos in the last pre-season game on the 1999 season at Mile High Stadium. That same weekend one of my and Ramon’s favorite groups Los Temerarios also happened to be in concert in Denver. I made reservations at the Adam’s Mark Hotel and had purchased tickets to the 49er/Bronco game for Ramon and Juan which took place on Friday September 3, 1999 (sadly for Ramon Denver won 34 to 3), and purchased tickets for all 3 of us for the Temerarios concert the following day Saturday September 4, 1999. We stayed the entire weekend and while the concert was memeorable so was the fact that the Adam’s Mark Hotel staff had demonstrated racial profiling against Ramon and Juan when they attempted to partake in hotel services which we paid to have access to. But the Adam’s Mark is not the issue in this article.

      What that has to do with his forgery/theft case is beyond me as is the prior part 1. If his poor lawyer has to listen to that lengthy meaningless and/or irrelevant crap in terms of his case, there would be no wonder to his legal fees climbing. I doubt a judge would let him put a jury through that babbling.

      Ignoring his drug running details (maybe worthy of a sentence in between), and his attacks on Deputy DA Jones that have no bearing on his innocence or guilt of these charges, here’s a summary of what we’ve been told that is somewhat relevant from the first two parts:
      “my best friend and room-mate Ramon Caraveo … met in the fall of 1998.”
      “Juan Gutierrez … moved in with Ramon & me.”
      “at the Birthday party for Ramon … Ramon and I both met Carmen Segura (Juan’s sister) for the first time. This was July 1999.”
      “One Carmen Segura did on Feb 15, 2001 make a report with the Pueblo Colorado Police Department accusing me of having stolen and forged her 1999 Federal and State income tax refund checks. ”

      That’s pretty much all one needs to know. The bulk is largely rambling irrelevance to the case. But there’s little legal meat to anything he’s said so far – aside from him telling the court that his road to living a proper legal life when he left Colorado prison in 1997 got quickly sidetracked into drug dealing making him a habitual felon.

      • Meesh says:

        Thanks WTPL? for saving it, sounds to me that once again the “Absolute” was talking, he’ll probably say the site was at fault and prematurely posted this *stoopid*post. What an *idiot*!

        On his work days POS has been busy posting important stuff. 🙄

        OY!!!

        • Indeed.

          SicLiar turned
          “When Politics Turn Facts into Fiction, and Fiction into Facts Part II of III”

          into:

          “Page Not Found”
          “The page you requested could not be found”

          How long before we start saying that when the authorities wonder what happened to this habitual felon in forgery & theft?

          “SicLiar Not Found!”
          “The habitual felon you requested could not be found …”

          • Meesh says:

            A post doesn’t stay up for over 14 hours (without going unnoticed) and as far as that goes it does not automatically posts itself….unless when the author was blitzed he posted and just rolled out of bed at about 2pm the next day and realizes it. 🙄 Hungover *idiot*

            • Dennis says:

              Gee Meesh, since you already know the answer why ask the question? This time around it was so utterly pointless that I didn’t even want to spend time trying to save it. I assume he will get back to work later tonight once the booze kicks in.

            • Meesh says:

              I’m happy that WTPL? took the time to post it, pointless or not.

              BTW I don’t think I asked a question. The information is not for *my*benefit but for whoever visits here, yes I know this…but others may not know. Shortly after *zapping* his post, once again FatAss announced on FB…Now does his site automatically post links to Twitter/Facebook too?

              “We have removed this post we’ll post when it’s completed. The article published prematurely due to a glitch in the scheduling.”

              Scheduling? I think not.Of course he deleted that too, there’s no glitches with the site but the ASS-ministrator.
              Now I will go back and stay out of trouble. Catch you all on the flip flop… 🙂

            • Dennis says:

              BTW Meesh, I was joking about you asking that question. And yes, WTPL? did a great job in grabbing it. I tried early this morning but was having problems getting it to save and copy and just gave up.

            • Meesh says:

              No problem Dennis, yes, I know 🙂

              Oh the *idiot* thinks he has safe-guarded his website from copy/paste (he has adjusted it so nobody can copy, hehe methinks he did it because of us)…

              There’s ways of getting around it….maybe WTPL? (who told me how) can post all the various ways here…

              who knows, Larry might learn something….Nah he’s beyond help.

      • Dennis says:

        Mostly, he seems to be trying to confuse the issue by turning it into some kind of presentation against the victim, but he is doing a really lousy job of it. He primarily is letting the world know that he was running a one-man crime wave and was getting away with murder back in those days. Not sure if this is exactly a “defense.”

  50. Dennis says:

    I predict that the next screwed up posting will be around 2am tonight. Followed by the next Page Not Found notice around noon tomorrow. This should go on for a few days. He really is an idiot.

    • Dennis says:

      OK, I was wrong. I forgot that it was a 3-day weekend and the heavy drinking will probably continue for a while. So Part II is being “reformatted.” Over and over again. Right down to the last drop.

  51. Legion is one of those loud mouth “life of the party” types who forgets that he exists unless there are people watching him or searching for him. “I stink therefore I am” is his credo. There’s a medical/psychological term for what he suffers from but I can’t think of it right now.

    • kstreet607 says:

      The first thing that comes to mind is a specific type of narcissism

      Pay Attention to Me! When Is It Borderline Disorder?
      Borderlines want attention; narcissists want admiration and attention

      • I had thought of narcissism. But as you pointed out, narcissists aren’t necessarily evil and destructive – that wouldn’t get them the admiration they crave and expect. Borderline disorder sounds plausible. But considering what he tried to do to you, just plain PSYCHO would do.

        But thanks for helping me out here, K. 🙂

      • Dennis says:

        In a sense, you are both right. In the Q & A called Pathological Liars – Relationship Scam Artists http://www.healthyplace.com/personality-disorders/main/pathological-liars-relationship-scam-artists/ the core behavior is generally classified as a form of psychopath. “Basically, psychopaths view other people as sources of gratification and act accordingly without remorse or conscience. At one end of continuum, you have violent criminals — at the milder end, you have functioning, highly successful narcissists who do well professionally and abide by the law but wreak interpersonal havoc….” says “Brent Turvey, forensic scientist and criminal profiler at the Academy of Behavioral Profiling in Sitka, Alaska, and author of the just released second edition of “Criminal Profiling: An Introduction to Behavioral Evidence Analysis.”

        So basically, Fat Boy is at the more extreme end (based upon both his criminal record and his conduct over recent years). The narcissist element is part of the picture, but just one part of a larger (and pretty nasty) whole. A quick way of explaining this would as follows: A narcissist wants your admiration and attention. The psychopath wants your admiration, attention, respect, and wallet. Likewise, if you reject the narcissist, he will most likely see that as your loss. The psychopath will want revenge because you have “respected” them.

        • Meesh says:

          Psychopath yes agree with Dennis, he’s complex *probably text-book of a mixture…most important there is little doubt in my mind, FatAss is a *sociopath* in every sense of the diagnosis…

          #1) Sociopaths are charming. (definitely not sexy though)
          #2) Sociopaths are more spontaneous and intense than other people.
          #3) Sociopaths are incapable of feeling shame, guilt or remorse
          #4) Sociopaths invent outrageous lies about their experiences
          #5) Sociopaths seek to dominate others and “win” at all costs.
          #6) Sociopaths tend to be highly intelligent…(Hmm ok far-fetched I will provide you the link that defines this in depth)
          #7) Sociopaths are incapable of love (Self-loathing too)
          #8) Sociopaths speak poetically
          #9) Sociopaths never apologize.
          #10) Sociopaths are delusional and literally believe that what they say becomes truth

          The article defines each area, instead of Charles Manson they should have FatAss’ mug. Read the complete article here—-> http://www.naturalnews.com/036112_sociopaths_cults_influence.html

          • Dennis says:

            Good point Meesh. But quickly going through the list, I can’t help but notice that Fatso flunks items 1, 6, and 8. So Lardo is a failure even as a sociopath. No wonder he is losing his cult.

            • Meesh says:

              Yeh I know…I guess I watch too many episodes of *Criminal Minds* on TV. 🙂

              He needs to be institutionalized for life….he’s a mix-bag of psychosis’s.. narcissist,psychopath,sociopath…he was probably dropped on his head at birth, explaining the *fugliness* too. They say if you’re evil enough, your features change throughout the years.

            • “They say if you’re evil enough, your features change throughout the years.”

              Oh no! I never heard that one before! Is that what’s happening to me?

            • Semi-seriously, though, I like to follow sayings, especially the peculiarly ethnic ones. “If you’re evil enough your features change” sounds like something I might hear from some relatives down South. If you don’t mind me asking do you remember where you first heard it?

  52. Meesh says:

    When Politics Turn Facts into Fiction, and Fiction into Facts Part II of III

    May 27, 2014
    By Lawrence Sinclair

    (Editor’s note: because of the amount of detailed information and the period of time being covered in this report we have decided to run the piece in 3 parts.)

    As I continue to walk you through time before and leading up to the false claims that I stole and forged Carmen Segura’s 1999 Tax refund checks, it is my intent to put it all out there, so that no one can say only part of the story was told. Some of this story has already been told in the book Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder? and the parts of this story which took place beginning in 2008 will be completely chronicled in detail in the upcoming book When One Man Stands. We ended part I of III with my meeting Carmen for the first time at Ramon’s birthday party in July 1999. Left is the scene of the alleged crime as it looks today (it is a far cry from the landscaped clean place I kept it).

    July and August of 1999 turned out to be spent mostly cleaning up for Ramon’s mother who had gotten herself into yet even more trouble brought on by her family members who were more interested in covering their own asses than they were in doing the right thing, what ever the right thing is in the drug trade. It was in August of 1999 that after doing clean up for MaryLu in North Carolina I had secured a new customer in South Carolina and began arranging to have what MaryLu and her friend could not sell themselves directed to the new customer in South Carolina. What was selling in Colorado and New Mexico for $400 to $600 was selling in South Carolina for $1800 to $2400.

    As the summer progressed Carmen, her husband Rogelio and son Joshua became more and more a part of my life and that of Ramon through visiting and eating together. We even started going to Jalapeno’s together (Right is a photo of what was Jalapeno’s looks like today at 2506 Lake Ave, Pueblo, CO.). Because Ramon and I had been going to Mexican concerts/dances as often as they came to the Colorado State Fair grounds and since we both liked the group Los Temerarios, I had decided to make arrangements for a trip to Denver for a Los Temerarios concert scheduled Labor Day weekend.

    Labor Day weekend 1999 was going to be a special one indeed for myself, Ramon and as it turned out, Juan. Ramon was a rabid Jerry Rice and San Francisco 49er’s fan and the 49er’s just happened to be playing the Denver Broncos in the last pre-season game on the 1999 season at Mile High Stadium. That same weekend one of my and Ramon’s favorite groups Los Temerarios also happened to be in concert in Denver. I made reservations at the Adam’s Mark Hotel and had purchased tickets to the 49er/Bronco game for Ramon and Juan which took place on Friday September 3, 1999 (sadly for Ramon Denver won 34 to 3), and purchased tickets for all 3 of us for the Temerarios concert the following day Saturday September 4, 1999. We stayed the entire weekend and while the concert was memorable so was the fact that the Adam’s Mark Hotel staff had demonstrated racial profiling against Ramon and Juan when they attempted to partake in hotel services which we paid to have access to. But the Adam’s Mark is not the issue in this article.

    Sometimes it paid to use the old CommNet car phone.

    September was spent continuing to try and clean up MaryLu’s NC mess and concentrate on business that I had established in South Carolina which made up for lost business as a result of MaryLu’s problems. In fact it was my establishing that new customer base in South Carolina that kept MaryLu from losing everything she had. All this time I would continue to make drives between Pueblo and Kansas City and Albuquerque. The whole time I am looking for any Attorney to represent MaryLu’s husband who was the individual that Greensboro, NC authorities had his true name on the arrest warrant. On September 18, 1999 I had the Oscar De La Hoya/Felix Trinidad fight ordered and the event was a party with Ramon, his Aunt, Dad, Uncle Arturo and his wife and daughter, as well as Juan, and his family members Martha, Bobby, Carmen, et al… This was just one of several fights I made sure we had ordered on pay-per-view for everyone to get together and watch. Ramon was an avid Julio Ceasar Chavez fan and I was an avid Oscar de la Hoya fan. In fact I had put out a good amount of money for signed boxing gloves by Chaves and de la Hoya as well as signed fight photos for us to have. This whole time Carmen, her sister Martha and her husband Bobby Trujillo (I knew Bobby’s daughter from a previous marriage) and Martha’s oldest daughter from a previous marriage had become regulars in our social circle with their brother Juan living with me and Ramon. In fact it was around this time that Carmen had asked me if I could see if my landlord would rent the 1320 E. 4th Street side of the home to her and Rogelio.

    October came and with it came Juan (Carmen’s brother) getting deeper into debt to me when he borrowed money to buy a car from a Pyramid Motors auto auction which Carmen and her husband attended with Juan and was present when I was called and then drove over to the auction site on Pueblo Blvd to pay with my credit card for the car Juan had just bought. The car was a Hyundai Elantra. I even bough an old Toyota 4X4 at the auction that I ended up giving to Ramon’s Uncle Arturo. In the end of October I made yet another trip from Pueblo to South Carolina (this trip was made with my obtaining permit to travel from my parole officer) though it would be this very trip that would also be connected to my meeting then Illinois State Senator Barack Obama (that story is told in Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder? and will not be addressed her). It was before this trip that I had arranged for Carmen to rent the other side of the home and had infact gotten the owner Darrell Chapman to completely redo the bathroom I was returning from the approved travel to South Carolina when I was notified that Lee was graduating from Naval basic training in Great Lakes Illinois on November 5, 1999. I returned to Pueblo from the trip to South Carolina and not having time to turn around and drive to Illinois, I made a reservation on Delta Airlines flying from Colorado Springs Colorado to Salt Lake City with a connecting flight to Chicago O’Hare. I left on November 2, 1999 in the evening arriving in Chicago November 3, 1999. Because I had not notified my PO I had returned from South Carolina I called and left a voice message on the office answering system that I had extended my trip for another week and would be returning on November 8, 1999. Upon my return on November 8, 1999 I was taken into custody for extending my trip without authorization and was released approximately 8 days later.

    Shortly after my release my childhood friend and one of my South Carolina buyers David Dukes showed at my Pueblo home with some girl he had hooked up with after his wife served him with divorce papers. David it turned out had borrowed more than $4000 from one of my SC buyers saying he was coming to Colorado to pick up some product which was not the case. I had obtained tickets to the Monday (November 22, 1999) night game between the Denver Broncos and Oakland/LA Raiders at Mile High Stadium. Juan (who had moved out of my and Ramon’s house and into the 1320 side with his sister Carmen on November 18, 1999) and Ramon both were unable to go to the game with David so a friend of mine who is one of the biggest Bronco fans to ever live agreed to go with David to the game. They got there late but as my friend Frank said, “I had a blast.”

    Thanksgiving 1999 my home was broken into while I and Ramon were gone for the holiday. I lost well over $16,000 in collectibles and jewelry in the breakin. As the holiday season came closer Carmen and her sister Martha were given a catering contract by a friend of mine (who managed a local Rent-to-Own store) who I asked to hire Carmen & Martha to cater the Christmas party they were planning to throw for customers The photo on the right is of me and Carmen’s son Joshua at the very Christmas party she and her sister Martha had been given the catering job at my request.

    I began decorating for Christmas and had started buying gifts for all of Ramon’s family as well as Juan, Carmen and Martha’s. The idea was to have one Christmas with Ramon and his family from Joroso, Colorado at the house in Pueblo, and then one Christmas with his sisters who were still living in their mothers home in Albuquerque and one for us with Carmen, Juan, Martha & Bobby and their kids. The photo on the right is of Juan’s niece (his sister Martha’s oldest daughter) at my home getting her drink on with a couple of her girlfriends. We had pretty much celebrate Christmas with all the different families before Christmas had even arrived and the tree which I had put so much money time and energy into was given to a family who didn’t have a tree completely decorated right out of our house. It is important to note that throughout this entire time I was giving away tens of thousands of dollars on a weekly basis and we still had what we (Ramon & I) needed to pay our bills. It was because I was able to pay our bills that I allowed Juan (Carmen’s brother) to get so far into debt to me for cell phone, rent, money to buy his car and loans.

    It was during a Christmas get together in my home that Carmen’s husband Rogelio Reyes had just a little too much to drink and started making sexual advances toward me in front of Carmen and Carmen’s sister Martha. Out of respect to Carmen, I thought it would be best for me to put an end to the party and have Rogelio go back over to their side of the house and go to bed. I made the mistake in that I thought nothing of helping get Rogelio back to his house and into his bedroom. It is important to remember that the property though a duplex, there was a door that connected the two on the basement level and it was through this entrance that I with Carmen and her sister Martha following walked Rogelio back to his room. It was when I got Rogelio to his bed and let him down that he reached and started to kiss me. I saw Carmen standing looking in and I know she saw her husband kissing me and I know she also saw me pulling away and telling Rogelio that was wrong. But it seems none of that mattered because Carmen had immediately become very cold and stand offish toward me and a lot of that was the result of her sister Martha running her mouth and trying to stir up trouble between me and Carmen. A photograph was taken of Rogelio pulling the waist band of my sweat pants open looking at my butt. That photo will also be used in the defending against these knowingly false charges.

    I will walk you through what took place from New Years 2000 through the filing of the alleged theft and forgery report by Carmen Segura in February 2001 in Part III of III. Part III will reveal yet even more drama and efforts by the sister of Carmen and Juan to create as much drama as possible. Including the niece pictured above on the right creating a situation between me and Ramon that resulted in Ramon breaking his arm destroying anything and everything he could put his fist through in our home on Valentines 2000. Part III will show how the alleged victim not only lied about where she says she and I were; she lied about claiming I ever took her mail to her and she failed to tell Police or the DA that in June 2000 her husband, brother and brother-in-law entered the Colorado City home of Jorge Diaz threatened him and then robbed the residence of all property belonging to me (I was residing in Colorado City after giving up the East 4th Street home.)

    Related articles: See Former Pueblo Deputy DA Stephen A. Jones Takes Parting Shot – and The Real Story On 13 Year Old Colorado Warrant

    There’s pictures of other people that I refuse to copy or save…cannot understand the purpose of them…..next a blurb of what’s going on with his case.

    Case Update: I retained counsel in Pueblo Colorado and appeared with Counsel in Court Monday April 28, 2014. The matter was continued to June 9, 2014 and counsel has asked the Pueblo District Attorney to turn over all discovery in the case. As of Friday May 23, 2014 the District Attorney’s office had not yet turned over discovery in the case, but by law, has until May 28, 2014 (30 days) to do so. In the meantime I will continue to obtain copies of documents from agencies that will support my case and poke holes statements that have been made in this case. I want to remind everyone of something I made crystal clear in the summer of 2008 when I was accused in Delaware of something that the Attorney Generals Office had already determined was not a crime but they chose to allege it was for political purposes, I will never plead guilty to something I know I did not do, just as in my entire lifetime I have never challenged anything I knew I was guilty of doing.

  53. Dennis says:

    So his “defense” is that Carmen knew that her husband saw his butt? And he wants to introduce a photo of his butt as evidence? He thinks that this will “crack” the case? My heart goes out to both judge and jury.

    • Meesh says:

      See? He *thinks* he’s a heart-throb…. He’s *delusional* and early signs of *dementia* too… Let’s add this to his psychosis’s. 🙂

      • Dennis says:

        OK. But I do not want to see his butt. That’s his defense? Take me to court and I will drop my pants?

        • The idea is to convince the jury that the charges grew out of a pissing match over whose butt Carmen’s husband liked more. He will play cute and coy and make eyes at certain jurors – all with the intent to send them two important messages, i.e., 1) that there is more background to all this than they care to know and 2) that he is no threat to anyone and should not be sent to jail where he could be harmed. He only needs to reach one juror. That might not be so hard to do considering that the victim was Hispanic and the Defendant is White and gay.

  54. Meesh says:

    Oh for pete’s sake on his Facebook…. he announces his thrilling post by liking it and says this.. 🙄

    Larry Sinclair likes an article on Larry Sinclair.

    4 hours ago
    .

    Let the parties start to get a little nervous about Part III of III and what it will reveal.

    Changes his background pick to this…

    Larry Sinclair changed his cover photo.
    4 hours ago · Edited

    Who is that youngster????

    Dennis, I swear he *thinks* he’s hot.

  55. Meesh says:

    We have another new post —–> HERE Let’s move everything there, K?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: