“Tomorrow in my article When Politics Turn Facts into Fiction, and Fiction into Facts I will take you on a walk through my life from the summer of 1999 through the filing of the false report by the alleged victim in 2001 along with photos of all parties, and including the efforts by the alleged victim and her family to file previous knowingly false reports with Police just days before the Colorado report was filed… Sadly my having to defend myself against yet another false report will bring out some very private and personal matters that will cause some to be embarrassed, but that’s what happens when you make someone defend against a false charge.”
Well it’s been two weeks since announcing his upcoming chilling revealing post, he’s finally got it done (I think)… it’s obvious that Lardo the lwayer has been hard at work cracking the case (of vodka) while formatting and reformatting a legal defense that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that he knows the fastest route from Florida to Mexico. The first new post is back to selling his crappy original “book” (while also pitching the film rights?). Couple of funny things about this hot offer for the book.
The pitch is really unclear about what he is really wanting to sell since copyright for the book and film rights are two different things. Besides, if someone were stupid enough to buy the book’s copyright, then they would have the film rights, period. As for just buying the film rights, why bother?
Virtually everything in the book the big dumbass has already pumped into numerous so-called “news” sites through interviews and news stories written by other people. Every thin detail of his tale is covered in a wide and, because of it being forced out there as news stories, in a public manner that allows a filmmaker the ability to go right around him and the book. Nobody needs his stinkin’ film rights. Why buy the cow when you can get the foul sour milk for free?
One last point of irony about the film rights. As an event that he has worked hard at turning into a news item, he has little grounds for defending the film rights to his “book.” But, if he were to announce that it is all a WORK OF FICTION, he would be able to better defend his control over the film rights. Just a bit of FYI.
Then the post goes into another attack of former DA Jones and his “factually” false filings while providing absolutely no support for anything (and BTW Fatso, you did NOT win that lawsuit; the other guy basically blew it in the primarily hearing because he didn’t provide any support evidence – might want to take note of that “problem”). Then he rants a bit about the Delaware case claiming that it was dismissed for lack of evidence (no you idiot, it was dismissed because you paid the victim back his money). Without further ado see the first post below:
“Rights to Controversial 2009 Book on Obama
Can Be Yours” – April 15, 2014 By ASS-ministrator
“In June 2009 the book Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder? was published and released. In September 2009 the Amazon Kindle version of the book was released and in January 2010 the Paperback version of the book was released. Despite the intentional and deliberately published false claims that the author Larry Sinclair had failed two polygraph tests (in 2011 video filed in a $30 Million Defamation suit Parisi et al v Sinclair et al showed the world that Sinclair according to the computer had in fact passed the polygraph despite Ed I. Gelb’s biased report stating it showed deception) and despite having to defend against a $30 million defamation suit brought in the US District Court in the District of Columbia (Sinclair prevailed in said suit) the book is still available through limited outlets and still peeks the interest of many who have yet to become aware of the book.
Almost 5 years later the Amazon Kindle version still consistently ranks in the Kindle paid categories. 🙄
Today it is announced that the complete and exclusive publication, distribution, and any and all future film or television rights to the book can belong to you. Despite Sinclair’s repeatedly prevailing over every possible effort to discredit him or attack him for the past 6 plus years, he was recently hit with yet another long attempted effort to sideline him when he was arrested on March 20, 2014 at his home in Holly Hill, Florida on a Colorado warrant which Sinclair had repeatedly been told was going to be dismissed. The Real Story On 13 Year Old Colorado Warrant A former Deputy District Attorney by the name of Stephen A. Jones (Jones is reported to have engaged in the online attacks of Sinclair and working with those responsible for the anti-Sinclair websites since late 2008 when the Colorado matter was turned into a political football) who was the subject of a Colorado Opens Record Act and Colorado Criminal Justice Records Act request dated December 1, 2012 and faxed to the Pueblo County District Attorneys Office on December 3, 2012, retaliated against Sinclair for filing the FOIA requests by filing before Pueblo District Court Judge Jill Mattoon on December 11, 2012 a knowingly factually false motion seeking to have the 2001 Colorado Warrant reissued with a “nationwide extradition” jurisdiction. Former Pueblo Deputy DA Stephen A. Jones Takes Parting Shot Sinclair contrary to the many internet posted claims has not run from the Colorado matter but in fact had been working from the moment he became aware of the matter to have it dismissed. According to information obtained from Colorado officials, Gus Sandstrom, District Attorney at the time the warrant was obtained had agreed to reduce the bond amount to $5000 early on but that information was never forwarded to Sinclair or anyone else. In 2004 Sinclair himself filed a motion with the Pueblo District Court seeking to have the warrant dismissed. At that time the Pueblo County District Attorney’s Office was provided with irrefutable evidence showing the alleged victim Carmen Segura had in fact given out right false statements to Police and investigators from the start on Feb 15, 2001. Since the March 20, 2014 arrest Sinclair has posted the $15,000 bond and few to Colorado on March 23, 2014 and appeared before a District Court Judge on March 24, 2014. Sinclair will return to Colorado on April 28, 2014 either with retained counsel or to inform the Judge that despite his best efforts he has been unable to retain private counsel as of that date. In June 2008 Sinclair at the hands of internet warriors who hide behind screen names and anonymous proxy servers was arrested in Washington, DC on a non-exsistant fugitive from justice warrant out of Delaware. Sinclair spent 10 days sitting in the Metro DC jail before being taken to Delaware where he was released on the promise to appear in court. At that time Delaware AG Beau Biden had knowingly sought a sealed Grand Jury indictment on a charge accusing Sinclair of theft despite having full knowledge no theft had ever occurred. Sinclair prevailed in that case when he refused to accept a plea agreement offering him a misdemeanor and one year probation and instead insisted it proceed to trial which was scheduled for 9-11-2008. Three days into the 2008 Democratic Convention the Delaware matter was dismissed for “lack of evidence” but not before Sinclair and his supporters had to cough up more than $15,000 in attorney fees and travel expenses. Now more than 6 years later Sinclair is facing yet another false accusation lodged in 2001 and kept alive by politics and he will defend against these as he has always vowed to do. In an effort to raise the money needed to pay Attorney retainer and fees Sinclair is offering up the complete Copyright and all exclusive rights of publication, distribution, etc for sale. The buyer can choose to take it out of publication; pitch it as a future film or TV movie or put it into widespread distribution or whatever he/she chooses to do with it. The asking price for the Copyright on this book is $20,000.00 Interested buyers email sales@lsnewsgroup.com for more information and/or to arrange to purchase these rights.
Then there’s the second post, the magical one that is suppose to explain why he is innocent in the Colorado case. It’s long and winding and really a dumb ass piece in which he inadvertently confirms that he was spending time driving all over America drug running. Lots of bull crud talk about how everybody at some dive bar loved and respected him for his manly qualities. Seemed to have been spending his time hanging around lots of two-bit low-life criminal types (all of whom were really great folks who would give you the stolen shirt off their back if they were not so busy with the drug dealing and the human trafficking, you know). What is his “defense?” Damn if I know. There is no defense. Actually, it sounds as if the DA has missed some charges. The whole thing makes no blasted sense. First he belly aches about how those horrible online stalkers make him sound like a no good dirty dog and then he waxes nostalgic about his life as a scum sucking no good dirty dog. Not only does this nitwit need a lawyer but he needs a lawyer who can tell him to shut his pie hole before they throw the book at him.
(UPDATE: “Page Not Found The page you requested could not be found. – See more at: https://www.lsnewsgroup.com/when-politics-turn-facts-into-fiction-and-fiction-into-facts/#sthash.IswChVyT.dpuf”
I assume that once the vodka ran out Sinclair realized that he was writing a confession, not a defense. Guess he was having trouble remembering which was which from his lwa school days. As suspected, since posted, this post can no longer be viewed in its entirety , that’s okay we have saved it below for your viewing pleasure. You’re welcome Turd Brain!
“When Politics Turn Facts into Fiction, and Fiction into Facts” – April 15, 2014 By Lawrence Sinclair
“It is sad, but a simple fact of our society today is that when there is a political benefit for someone or a group, politics has a way of turning basic facts into fiction and fiction into facts. That is exactly what has happened in the matter of a 2001 arrest warrant issued in Pueblo Colorado against me. Since making the allegations against ten candidate Barack Obama in January 2008 politics has turned the facts of this matter into fiction and politically motivated fiction into what they want to be facts. Almost four years to the day these so called “law abiding citizens” who have engaged in hacking; internet threats, intimidation and filing of false reports (in order to keep their names from being released under the Colorado Open Records Act) so they could obtain official records without being identified, simply for the purpose of editing and distorting them, former Pueblo Colorado Deputy District Attorney Stephen A. Jones did what many have been doing since 2008, he filed a factually false Motion before Pueblo District Court Judge Jill Mattoon (a former Pueblo Deputy DA herself) in order to make a Colorado only warrant a nationwide one. See Former Pueblo Deputy DA Stephen A. Jones Takes Parting Shot – and The Real Story On 13 Year Old Colorado WarrantBecause the so called facts as presented by those who have tried to use this matter to misrepresent me and others, have been posted on countless internet sites and even Politico.com jumped on the misrepresentation bandwagon in 2008, I have decided to take readers on a journey starting in the spring of 1999 and ending with the filing of an affidavit for an arrest warrant in May 2001.The journey begins when I rented a duplex located at 1320 1/2 E. 4th Street in Pueblo, Colorado from one Darrell Chapman. Shortly after renting this residence I had the unfinished basement carpeted, drywalled and electrical installed as a bedroom for my best friend and room-mate Ramon Caraveo (that’s Ramon with his nephew left) Ramon & I met in the fall of 1998. My neighbors at 1320 E 4th St were a group of guys who lived and worked in Pueblo (most of whom were not in the US legally) and we got along very well. This house at one time was one unit and while the ground levels had been separated, the two were still connected by way of an opening in the basement which had simply been blocked off with a sheet of plywood. As time passed one of the guys living next door, Juan Gutierriz (or Munoz, or Gonzales or Martinez which ever he chose to use at the moment) had issues and was looking for another place to stay, we (me & Ramon) had already gotten to know him and I told Ramon that if he wanted we could let Juan move in and he could share the basement with Ramon. Juan moved in with Ramon & I.Ramon was a truly loyal friend and he was someone you could trust with your life. You will see what I mean as we get to Feb 2000. Ramon’s family used to tease us by saying that if I were a woman Ramon would have the perfect wife. We enjoyed the same music, we both loved boxing though we may not have agreed oo who was the better boxer, we enjoyed going to a Pueblo night club called Jalapeno’s and we enjoyed the fights that would break out inside the club and outside after closing. One night while at Jalapeno’s one guy tried to get in Ramon’s face over the girl he was with and I stepped in letting the idiot know he would have to go through me if he wanted to get to Ramon. Funny how everyone in the bar that night couldn’t wait til closing to jump the guy because he backed down from my challenge. Make no mistake folks, Jalapeno’s was the Mexican bar to be at and it was all about the macho machismo every night. I was known as the only garvocho or gringo to ever go in there on a regular basis and the fact that I was an openly gay or Joto gringo wasn’t lost on many. But I had the respect of most every regular that ever frequented Jalapeno’s.Shortly after Ramon and I first met I was introduced to his mother who used the name MaryLu Domingez after having been on the run from Arizona authorities after a car accident revealed she was hauling large amounts of marijuana and cocaine. It was not secret to any of Ramon’s family what his mother did for a living. His mother made the hard decision to let Ramon grow up with his father and Aunt (his fathers sister) Maria Alvarez in the small farming community in southern Colorado off Colorado 159 south of San Luis and just a couple of miles north of the Colorado/New Mexico line. Ramon was sheltered and when he went off to Pueblo to go to USC, his Aunt and Grandparents had done little to prepare him for what he needed to know to simply establish phone service and electric service. Ramon was quickly used by his cousins after he moved to Pueblo and because of those cousins Ramon was sued and had a judgment entered against him for having broken a lease that both he and his cousin were named on. Though the cousin and Aunt both refused to pay the cousins share, it was me who got the judgment removed and settled with the apartment complex to clear Ramon’s name. In early 1999 Ramon’s mother asked if would drive something out to her nephew in Greensboro, NC and she would pay me $4000.00 plus expenses. That was my introduction into the smuggling business and I learned real fast that $4000 was chump change for what I had been asked to do. See MaryLu was doing a brisk business in bring marijuana up to Colorado where she would get $4-500.00 per pound, but that was nothing compared to the $1600-$2000 per pound I could get for it in SC.In May 1999 MaryLu was having problems with her suppliers in Mexico because she had not paid them a whole lot of money that she owed them. In fact MaryLu had come to Pueblo and stayed with Ramon and I at the E. 4th St house in April 1999 and asked me to go with her to a customers house down the street from me who owed in excess of $50,000 but had claimed the merchandise was confiscated in a Police raid that resulted in the arrest of one son.”
Before we are hit by the impending deluge of horse manure, one quick note. Turd Brain keeps using the phrase “factually false.” Odd choice of phrase. In legal terms, the phrase factually false is used in regards to: “Sham pleading means an obviously frivolous or absurd pleading that is made only for purposes of vexation or delay. It is a written pleading that is factually false, not made in good faith, and that may be struck. It is entered for the mere purpose of delay and of a matter which the pleader knows to be false.” http://definitions.uslegal.com/s/sham-pleading/.
In other words, it is a defense tactic used solely for the purpose of jerking everybody around. It would not be used (now or ever) by a DA in filing charges (especially since charges are based on evidence, not pleads or accusations). Instead, it would be used by the person who has been charged as part of their attempt to deflect issues, confuse points, and generally stall the case for as long as possible. So I guess that Fat Boy is once again revealing his hand by accusing the other side of doing what he is actually doing. Obviously, we have already seen his “defense.” They better warm up the cell. It is going to be a long stay this time.
Now for the rating of these two fine posts….
“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”
Albert Einstein
,
That was great Dennis, the second post magically went *POOF* Good catch! I wonder what prompted *idiot* to take the post down? You’re right, it was obvious that the “Absolute” was doing the thinking for him again. Will he be tweaking it more? Good thing that we have a screenshot. 🙂
GOOD WORK Dennis, on your first authored post!
I assume that once the vodka ran out he realized that he was writing a confession, not a defense. Guess he was having trouble remembering which was which from his lwa school days.
Dennis, OH I missed FatAss’ “Absolute” Dazed, fueled posts…I noticed that he published that one in the weeee hours. 😉 He’ll go on denying that it was ever published and that we fabricated it…
How can we make this CRAP up? Once again my friend thanks for being on your toes…
Now everybody can you predict what will be Sickliar’s next move?
Just noticed this over at the Snooze site Facebook page:
A glitch? Is that what they now call it. Sounds so much better than drunk posting. Can’t wait to see how much deeper ol’Turd Brain plans to bury himself.
My first guess is that he actually realized it was stupid to bury his offer to sell the rights to the first book. That is kinda topical if he really does need the money…
Nevermind that $20,000 is an insane asking price. $20 is an insane asking price. IF he were smart, he would throw in the new, unpublished diatribe as well…he’s holding onto some crazy hope that he’ll get through the CO affair and come out swinging and able to publish and sell the new book (which is so far beyond relevancy – not that it really ever had any – it’s simply laughable). He simply _is_ that out-of-touch with reality.
This is just another example of liar-larr’s fail. To quote Crosby, Stills & Nash – “…he never failed to fail. It was the easiest thing to do.”
As for the second, since-pulled post – Liar-Larr is already planning on double-dipping. He thinks he’s actually going to sell the first book for $20k, then, should things go south for him for some reason in CO, he’s trying to set himself up as a sympathetic (but interesting!) media figure – but, of course, someone’s going to want to pay him to publish/release his life story! But selling the first book, which supposedly contains said life story, is going to create at least a mild conflict of copyright…he’s thinking ahead – poorly.
Yeah it sounds like Legion abruptly ended the second article before he finished the story. Maybe the cops broke in. In any event I think the reason he’s waxing so nostalgic over his Mexican “friends” is that if he gets any money at all, Mexico is where he plans to go. In fact, if he’s lost touch with his Ramon lover, the article might have been Legion’s way of trying to reach him for help with the escape to Mexico. That’s my take.
Could be. It certainly sounds as if he is shutting up the site and trying to cash in by any means possible before he bolts. Next up, he will try to sell the site to Ilse so she can continue her “mission” to save us all through violent insurrection. Then he will just need to shake down Sugar Daddy Freise for some gas money.
Gee, he removed that great defense. If he really had a lawyer, I suspect their case meetings would play like that scene in the show Scrubs:
Dennis, I’ll have to start calling you “SCOOP” I can’t wait to see what changes he’ll make… hope he mentions the “Human Trafficking business” too, that’s all that he seemed to forget.. seems to me that we have that story somewhere….the Hotel and Limo complaint (extortion) while he was on business while he was living in Laredo TX, what on earth was he doing checked into the Holiday Inn Civic Center in Laredo, when he was living there?—-> ( moving people into Texas)… The famous Hotel/Limo mishap.
Ooooooh here it is…you’re welcome Larry!
BooHoo you never pursued it when they turned you down flat, wonder why? Do tell… we interviewed the Hotel and they have a totally different account.
Larry Sinclair’s letter to Holiday Inn Civic Center in attempt of extortion:
And let’s not forget about the guy he left to die in the desert during this adventure. BTW Fat Boy, there is no statute of limitation on murder. Just a little FYI. Oh right, he just took ill and needed some fresh air or some bull crud like that, right?
I’d forgotten that one or didn’t know it. Please fill me in or remind me.
I would have to dig it up (no pun intended), but back when he was “working” in the Laredo area, one of his “clients” took ill after they crossed the border. Lardo got the car into a car, claiming he was taking him to the ER. The body turned up later in the desert. On the rare occasions (back in 2008) when Fat Boy would even discuss it, he sort of passed over it claiming that the guy died on the way to the ER. Maybe. Or maybe he was close to death and besides who needs attention at the ER. Or maybe the guy said he wanted some fresh air and would walk back to the hotel later. Or maybe…. SinkLiar doesn’t like talking about this one and will normally skip over the incident.
Good one Meesh. Thanks for the memories.
Of course, I am a tad upset that I have to wait until Easter (ironic or what) for the rest of the story. But we can all kind of guess what’s coming: Larry’s Defense:
1. They were low level drug dealers (and users) in deep debt to mean cartel types who would beat them senseless if they had money, so they asked me to take it.
2. Even if they hadn’t asked, I did so to “help” them. It was an act of charity. So I forged their names, cashed the check and took off with the dough because cartel types don’t mess with a manly man like me.
3. Did I mention that they were low level dealers and drug users? So why are you listening to their story? BTW, they might be illegals. I am a God-fearing American. So who are you going to believe. Remember what the good book says: Give unto Larry that which is Larry’s (so empty your pockets, suckers).
I really hope he doesn’t skip because I can’t wait to see him pitch this crazy tale to a jury. Once the judge and jury are done laughing their butts off, they can then invite him to stay for another 25 years.
SicLiar says “Almost 5 years later the Amazon Kindle version still consistently ranks in the Kindle paid categories.”
Let’s check that out for this book:
“rankings indicate a title must sell at least one copy a year to remain above a rank of two million.”
I couldn’t find the book offered at Barnes & Noble (includes Borders) nor Books-A-Million – probably due to the Parisi lawsuit.
Typical Amazon Kindle royalties (prior to 2010) are 35% of $8.21/book list price.
So let’s estimate his annual revenue from this book he’s trying to sell the rights to for $20,000:
1 hardcover book/year x 35% of $110 list price = $ 38.50 (if it’s still available…)
1 paperback book/year x 35% of $21.99 list price = $ 7.70
156 (being generous) kindle x 35% x $8,21 list price = $448.27
==================================================
Total from bookstores = $494.47 per year
– ignoring the trend that his book sales are in serious decline to a level of almost zilch
– and that ignores taxes one would have to pay on that revenue as opposed to sticking the $20,000 in a tax sheltered investment
And if one wanted to continue his direct sales, they’d be doing so without his assistance incurring printing costs, shipping costs, overhead of managing the website, time to respond to all the cranky or tinhat emails, legal risks and the labor to do that.
To break even, the raw value of the book is probably worth less than five years of that revenue – less than $2,500 – maybe to be generous, about half that. And it would cost you more than that in legal costs just to come up with a copyright contract with this career con man – knowing that he’ll turn around and rip you off by trying to continue to cash in on this scam.
That’s OK. Once he sells the film rights to Tom Cruise, the sales will go through the roof. I hear that Tom is already practicing his nasal snorting for the role.
BTW WTPL, good job with your break down on the book “sales.” Your math approach is well done. Came to same conclusion sometime back but I didn’t want to do the hard core math because 0 is 0 no matter how you get there.
(I’ve updated main post…too good for a comment) M 🙂
Further to that letters to the hotel, this is a copy of the post we made after I investigated that letter in February, 2010:
SicLiar corroborated part of this when he posted:
and I responded
To recap, I spoke with several Laredo witnesses to this incident. They attested to Larry writing that letter to the hotel for the $4,000 claim, the big tips given to hotel staff, Sinclair hanging with criminals, Sinclair running an operation to smuggle in illegal aliens and that the raid by the FBI and Border Patrol wasn’t due to the 2001 Colorado warrant.
Sinclair himself admitted to Globe maghazine “Although Sinclair has provided no evidence to back up his outrageous Obama stories, the 46 year old tells globe that he’s spent time in prison in Florida, Arizona and Colorado on credit card fraud and other charges. He also admits trafficking in cocaine, marijuana and “moving” people from Mexico to the United States. ”
Globe Magazine, Feb 28-Mar 3, 2008
At risk of beating a dead horse, I take issue again with this SicLiar claim from his current post:
Here again is the link to his 2004 affidavit with that supposed “irrefutable evidence”:
I’ll let the readers judge for themselves by looking for “irrefutable evidence” in that document because I don’t see any. Like his BS riddled lies about having sex with Obama, he provides absolutely no evidence – just a very suspicious, unproven account of his side of the story.
The facts claimed by the victim in this case, represented by the investigating CO police and agreed upon by Sinclair in his affidavit are that Sinclair deposited government checks into his own bank account that were made out to the victim. The victim claimed they did not endorse those checks nor authorize Sinclair to do deposit them. Nothing I can see in Sinclair’s affidavit provides “irrefutable evidence” that the victim gave false statements.
Hold on WTPL. Are you saying that you don’t see the factually false facts that have been filed falsely in a false factual manner? Instead, you are falling back on evidence? Documented evidence? Clear cut and screamingly obvious because it was their checks in his account? You must be a tough guy to convince….
It also doesn’t help one’s credibility case when they’re charged with felony forgery and an affidavit submitted to that criminal case representing the accused career felon forger is signed by someone forging his signature,
The two signatures in the middle of the first page are those used to sign his 2004 filings to the Colorado court. All the other signature samples are dramatically different.
The only other odd looking signature is from his Florida felony case when he forged himself as being “Avila-Adams” apparently in an effort to avoid repeat offender felony sentencing in Florida. So this isn’t the first time he used his forgery skills to fool a criminal court.
In this case, in August 2004, he was down in Mexico apparently lining up his illegal alien smuggling racket that FBI agent Henly eventually ran out of Laredo in 2007. See page 45 of Sinclair’s book
Obama spoke at the Democratic National Convention on July 27, 2004. The date of Sinclair’s 2004 affidavit is Aug 3, 2004 – just after.
In Rense and various other radio interviews, he claims he was in Mexico from 2003 when he got his passport until 2006 when he set up his illegal aliens operations in Laredo. To help keep the warrant Colorado state only and to deceive Social Security Disability, he had to pretend he was still hanging around Colorado and he provides his mother’s address on the affidavit. Arguably, part or all of the reason the warrant remained state only during those years is by his own deception of the Colorado court as to his true whereabouts. It would not be unreasonable to figure he was around Colorado as that was where his disability checks were going in 2004.
And let’s face it: the key reason he was even bothering to respond to the court was to go through the motions to get his disability reinstated because they’d cut him off due to the warrant and his lack of response to the court.
And here’s a copy of an email one of his supporters gave us when they found out he was lying (it did not come from us hacking his email)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/218926952/Larry-sinclair-Find-Motion-to-Dismiss-Email
that corroborates his mother’s involvement with the 2004 affidavit. Dated just before his first Youtube posting of his allegations against Obama, it also shows his financial motivation behind his Obama scam with “THIS COULD VERY WELL HELP U$”
Maybe he comes by his forgery talents honestly as his mother appears to have been involved in this 2004 affidavit deception.
LOLOLOLOL Dennis!
“Download Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder?.pdf free by entering your info below”
http://www.qkgbooks.com/?p=883313
Why pay $20,000 for something you can get for free? 🙂
Oh well, I was going to offer him $20 for the film rights. I think I can turn it into a comedy.
Holy Crap:
Three parts?! Will this finally be the garbage that he has so far in “When One Man Stands”?! Just like the first piece of crap that he wrote…it was published within his blawg posts….
Forget the popcorn, I plan on switching channels.
Uh oh. It’s now a mini-series. How much is he wanting for the rights?
We’ve got part 1 of his drivel already. He promised the whole thing April 2nd. The couple of readers who still visit his site could be really disappointed! At this pace, he might be in jail before his finishes the series.
One other thing: I don’t recall TP Murray (also dependent on SSDI) declaring the film rights he had contracted for in his bankruptcy.
His promotion site is still running:
http://webhdtv.wix.com/obamasinclair
Anyway, it might be legally questionable if Sinclair still owns those rights (not that they were really worth anything) … for those dumb enough to give him much money for his book that can be had for free …
Like everything else Sinclair, what a deceptive mess!
Good grief, he still has that site up? As far as I understood it, Murray abandoned that project after the blow out between him and Fatso. Either way, he wouldn’t need any stinkin’ film rights to the book since he is claiming to be doing a documentary about the book’s claims, which means that he is doing an “investigation” on the book. This is part of what I was talking about previously. Nobody would actually need the film rights to deal with the core public claims and material in the book.
At risk of folks puking in their mouth, I think “The Hungry Bottom” is more credible and has more potential as a gay porn film. 🙂
Thanks for tossing my lunch. Normally that is Meesh’s job but this will do.
Even back then CHUBS was a big fat liar…yeh right, in 2008 he was 30 and weighed from 170 – 190 lbs.
And here’s a guy who even in his post trying to sell his book full of BS, hypocritically complains about “internet warriors who hide behind screen names” having used the screen name “Hungry Bottom” in Laredo to solicit strangers for sex – in the wake of using 15 aliases to commit felonies like forgery.
Before we are hit by the impending deluge of horse manure, one quick note. Turd Brain keeps using the phrase “factually false.” Odd choice of phrase. In legal terms, the phrase factually false is used in regards to: “Sham pleading means an obviously frivolous or absurd pleading that is made only for purposes of vexation or delay. It is a written pleading that is factually false, not made in good faith, and that may be struck. It is entered for the mere purpose of delay and of a matter which the pleader knows to be false.” http://definitions.uslegal.com/s/sham-pleading/.
In other words, it is a defense tactic used solely for the purpose of jerking everybody around. It would not be used (now or ever) by a DA in filing charges (especially since charges are based on evidence, not pleads or accusations). Instead, it would be used by the person who has been charged as part of their attempt to deflect issues, confuse points, and generally stall the case for as long as possible. So I guess that Fat Boy is once again revealing his hand by accusing the other side of doing what he is actually doing. Obviously, we have already seen his “defense.” They better warm up the cell. It is going to be a long stay this time.
Good point, he often says that… what irritates me is when he constantly says “out right lies” in three words…anyway, hold on to your hat – today’s the day for installment ONE of the horse manure to start spreading.
But in CHUBS lingo it will probably be next week…he’ll have a highly religious Easter Message, can’t wait.
I have been holding my hat all day for part one and all I am seeing is a stupid promo for Gumball Rally 3000. I mean I realize that he is a lame brain and all, but come on. Now he is decking out the site with cheesecake photos of young women? How totally pathetic is he? And when is he going to deliver another round of factually false statements in the pathetic hope that his gibberish will some how delay the legal process?
Oh wait a minute. It is only 9pm in Florida. So the booze is still plentiful while he cranks up the copy. Will have to wait until last call.
While we wait for his next bizarro effort to sidestep reality, Fat Boy might need remidned that the real question is not why they would be extradite him now, but rather why they didn’t do that in the first place. You see, he is up on felony charges and in most cases, felony charges will carry national extradition (see http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_difference_between_a_felony_warrant_and_a_misdemeanor?#slide=1). OK, they were low level felonies but they were still felonies. So the only surprise was that they didn’t pursue him previously. However, the new DA is obviously willing to do it and that is just a fact jack. The out going assistant DA could have said all kind of weird things about Lardo and that doesn’t in any way alter the basic fact that HE IS A FLEEING FUGITIVE WANTED FOR TRIAL ON TWO FELONY COUNTS IN THE STATE OF COLORADO. As for the rest, he will just have to go back there and PRESENT IT IN COURT. Not online. Not to the two or three assholes who think he might be innocent. IN COURT. IN FRONT OF A JUDGE AND JURY.
So what do you say, Mr. Larry Sinclair. Got the balls to do it. Didn’t think so. I know. You’re facing 25 years. It will be a life sentence. And yes, you will most likely be convicted. So far, your defense is completely inadmissible and totally stupid. So please, add to the nonsense. Then hope to god that you can get a lawyer who just might know what they are doing because you sure has hell don’t.
It is 11:58pm. Do you know where your defense is? Must be getting reformatted.
It is now 12:03am, April 20. No show. Waiting for this jerk is worse than a Madonna concert. Guess the WiFi in that Mexican Catina he’s hiding out in ain’t as good as he thought. What a jackass.
Oh boy, part one has arrived. He has re-written it quit a bit and expanded as he goes into a long winded (and so far basically irrelevant) account of his massive drug dealing and smuggling with the folks who will later be ripped off by him. I assume he is working on the theory that the more he paints the victims as drug dealing crooks, the more he thinks he can “justify” his own crap. Meanwhile, he is pretty much jumping into a second-rate Elmore Leonard tale of petty crooks and dealers living a pretty stupid wretched live committing various crimes, all of which he is knee deep into and once again, I keep thinking that the cops are really missing out on hitting this scum bucket with more charges. Is this a “defense?” Only if he thinks that he can get them to drop the charges (or just not show up to court) because of all the drug crime stuff. Or maybe he is hoping to turn state witness against them. Or maybe he is just wasting everybody’s time because most of us have no doubt that he is nothing more than a two-bit thief, crook, and liar surrounded by a bunch of other two-bit hoods, thieves, and liars. So thus far, the plot only thickens like a pile of dog doo in the sun.
And by the way Fat Boy, if you really want to sell this sordid tale, you better add some sex. The reading public likes their crime stories juicy.
Dennis, if you copy/paste *coward* FatAss’ posts prior to commenting about them…we might be able to see what you’re referring to… Once again abba kadabra *POOF* I’m sure it must bave been another excruciating treat that you do not need to relive….LS News Group really ought to fire Douche ASS-ministrator<—"the glitch in the scheduling." who keeps missing deadlines. FatAss what a pansy—-> LOSER!
Hmmm the post starts with: “It is sad, but a simple fact of our society today is that when there is a political benefit for someone or a group, politics has a way of…” then you go to click and get this again 🙄
++++> Page Not Found The page you requested could not be found. – See more at: https://www.lsnewsgroup.com/when-politics-turn-facts-into-fiction-and-fiction-into-facts/#sthash.rhBpjanm.dpuf
Seems like it’s another Hit and Run posting…
Whazza matta FatBoy, cold feet?
What? He backed out again??!! If I had thought that the gutless nimrod wonder would do that I would have copied and pasted the whole crappy thing. Basically it starts out much as the original post, but skips all of the dreamy recollections of his lovely life with Ramon in their crappy hostel for illegals and their romantic nights getting drunk at a sleazy bar where the fistfights came as often as the drinks. Instead, he gets into a long description of his extremely active involvement in transporting cocaine between Mexico, Colorado, and the Carolinas in cooperation with some of the people who will later be known as the theft victims. I can only assume that he thought he was exposing what sleazeballs they all are but may have realized that he comes off sounding like the sleaze master himself. Besides, he is basically confessing to being involved in a virtual crime-wave with himself as one of the masterminds (especially when he discovers that they could make a lot more money shipping the nose candy to North Carolina).
So the best I can figure is that his defense is based upon some weird idea that the theft of that check was nothing compared to all of the real major crimes that he was actually committing. He may also be discovering that he may not be covered on the statute of limitation regarding these crimes. Statute of limitation is a little bit tricky depending upon the state of any investigations and a few other issues. He should be covered, perhaps. But if you have a new DA who is hot for an increase in convictions and you just found yourself with a perp who is willing to go online and confess to stuff that hasn’t even been brought up yet…. And since he is also admitting to inter-state (and international) drug trafficking, you then have the DEA and the FBI and Customs and who knows what all else…. Good grief, I should have saved it. Please Meesh, don’t take my Regulator license away. It was late. I was tired. It won’t happen again.
FatAss has always been known for his famous “Bait and Switch” I was sleeping so I missed it. Oh well, next time, it won’t be the last he’s been doing this since 2008…where he accuses us of fabricating “out right lies” sooo he must be disappointed too. He does this purposely, because he’s a WIMP that’s a DOUCHE….We’ve learnt since to take screenshots as well as Copy/Paste. It’s a game with him. If we post his really “sketchy posts” we get the word out for him, but then he denies the details/content…claiming he’s been victimized.
Procedures to be on the safe side:
1. Screenshot
2. copy/paste
3. comment
4. post
Not to worry Dennis, as I mentioned, we’re doing FatAss a favour to repost, he’s the “Gutless Coward” that he often accuses us of being.Just FatAss way of projecting, he’ll never change…by the way, *wave* to Larry!
Hey FatAss, you’re a joke, just a past time for most of us here.Nice to see you squirm, it’s obvious with all of these attempts to post…like it or not—> J-A-I-L awaits.
Take your Regulator license away?! Are you kidding me? Dennis,you deserve a medal to have endured reading that crap at such a late hour….(that’s when he usually posts these dillies) You get to see what goes on in that corrupt mind of his. ::::Shudder::::
SicLiar said: “It is sad, but a simple fact of our society today is that when there is a political benefit for someone or a group, politics has a way of…”
… (I’ll finish the rambling deleted thought for him)
… ‘making you forge signatures and deposit government checks (as you’ve done all your life in a criminal career devoted to threats, thefts and deceptions without a smidgen of remorse,) …
… made out to a person you allege traffics drugs, into your bank account
… many years before there was any politics whatsoever involved and a year and a half after any significant political benefit can be possibly derived because Obama will never run for public office again.’
That is the logic of the criminally mentally ill – with a past where he himself admits mental illness (in letters to court cases, in his book where he cites for example his own mother considering an exorcist to treat him, with his actions like faxing bullet riddled photos of President & Mrs Obama to the White House or in his allegedly insincere suicide attempt for sympathy in 2010 that he reported resulted in officials petitioning a court to have him committed).
Lost on him are the deceptions like exposure of his fraud perpetrated on the American people during the 2008 election or his threats, for example, death threats or veiled threats of burning peoples houses down that he’s made on members of this blog that continue from his days in prison where he acted on them – to help to fuel a desire to have him brought to justice.
In 2014, it has little to do with politics because exposure of his frauds in 2008 has proven him since then as so desperately lacking in credibility that he has absolutely no chance of any influence on 2014 politics.
This is merely a smoke screen to cover up his avoidance of the 2001 Colorado felonies. What we have to say has little to do with his innocence or guilt of this crime. His avoidance of dealing with this Colorado – except on an as needed basis to sustain his SSDI – suggests he fears the outcome … that once again, will have absolutely nothing to do with politics.
What this has to do with anything, I haven’t got a clue…..
I see he posted it again. But it’s pretty much the same old drivel. And there’s not lots new there compared to the trash in his book about this period.
So far, he’s effectively saying to the court:
Good luck with that!
WTPL,
Well, yeah. He is not addressing anything of relevancy to the charge. He is admitting to a shitload of criminal activities which I would think might be a problem for a guy who at the time had basically just gotten out of a Colorado slammer (for the second time) and like maybe he could be in trouble for leaving hanging around with most of these people and crap like that. But it has nothing to do with the charges. Heck, I doubt if any of this is even admissible in court. The only thing he is proving is the obvious fact that he is a complete two-bit, low level piece of scum trying to run a pretty serious multi-state drug ring. This is a defense?
However, he is up for two counts of felony theft and forgery. This stuff is only important in the off chance that they might yet be able to charge him with more.
Point in question: “This was July 1999. A good 9 months before Carmen told Police she had first met me!” So what. She could be wrong about lots of stuff. The problem is that her checks were in his account with a forged signature. Unless he’s got a nifty answer to how that happened, most of the rest is meaningless. I might also point out that what he is doing is exactly what is called Factually False. Lots of bogus claims and irrelevant details designed solely for the purpose of confusing the case and hopefully delaying action.
It looks to me like Ramon or someone in his crowd is wanted and Legion is teasing the D.A. with the prospect of all the in-depth information that he could cough up if only the D.A would make a deal. Remember, he tried a version of that with his Obama story.
Click to access statute-chart.pdf
The statute of limitations on drug running may have run out so how much use he is to them now is questionable. He took off from Colorado in 2000-2001.
Murder & forgery (and a few other crimes) have no statute of limitations in Colorado – which isn’t good for a habitual felon in forgery.
Given SicLiar’s habit for running away from crimes
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3290
“No statute of limitations shall extend to any person fleeing from justice.”
So that might muddy up a claim he might make that the statute of limitations applies to him.
As well, hiding in Mexico as he did for example would just toll (suspend) the statute of limitations.
I assume that his only focus is to try and intimate the victim into the hope that she will drop the charge and failing that, undermine her possible veracity as a witness. Not really a great plan but it is probably all he’s got. I suspect that he will also fall back on the “I was doing her a favor” claim, but that doesn’t really work in a theft and forgery case. So intimidation is all that’s left. Of course there is the slight problem that everything he is currently going on about has nothing to do with the case and most likely will never be allowed in court, so the victim might want to go stubborn and leave him fuming in court with an empty bag of tricks.
Or he could do like he did in Delaware and dip into one of his bank accounts, pay off the money he stole, then get the charges dropped. Of course, the fugitive flight thing might remain a sticky issue.
In response to Dennis APRIL 22, 2014 AT 11:33 AM:
If one robs a bank and gets caught, they do not often walk away when the caught robber says “Oh, I’m sorry for robbing that bank (not that SicLiar ever apologizes to his victims) and here’s your money back so I can carry on with my freedom”.
Giving the money back can help reduce the sentence. And restitution is often a part of a sentence for such a crime. But they often get a conviction and sentence beyond restitution.
That Delaware decision struck me as a “funny”
result. As much as he howled about his arrest for it being politically motivated (the Grand Jury indictment came down before folks knew about his Obama claim), I do wonder if him getting off without jail time was in part politically motivated – to minimize the chances of the mainstream media picking up his story. Maybe I’ve been reading too much SicLiar!
Of course, it could very well be, and probably more likely, that there was some legal issue with the evidence (maybe they lost the original money orders and just had copies for example – there was a delay providing his defense lawyer with them).
WTPL
Oh I’m not saying that whatever he thinks he is planning for his “defense” will work. Oddly enough, he is a pretty crappy lwayer and he has a fool for a client. I’m just trying to second guess whatever dumb notions are floating through his thick head.
After looking over the Delaware case info, I remained very surprised it was dismissed.
They had two sets of counterfeit money orders attempting to fleece two different victims. I’m not absolutely positive but it looked like he found out about one being counterfeit before paying $300 to the second victim to get them cashed.
They knew his lengthy criminal history in fraud & forgery.
He couldn’t explain how he got the second set of money orders to the police. The first set came from an ex-brother in-law in CA and he hadn’t been in CA much since before he went to Mexico. You have to wonder whether the ex-brother-in-law would ever admit to sending him counterfeit money orders.
He’d been picked out of a police line up by one of the victims..
He admitted a bunch during his interview by police.
He didn’t seem to produce his TX driver’s license – he did produce his expired AZ license – maybe to avoid FBI agent Henly who had just run him out of Laredo for the illegal aliens (and maybe to avoid CO though the Delaware police did see the CO only warrant).
He’d just taken an apartment funded by SSDI … and then suddenly took off to Duluth without paying the victim.
What was a guy on SSDI doing recently possessing roughly $5,000 in auto insurance payouts plus $5,000+ in money orders? SSDI has a $2,000 cash limit.
All I can figure is they messed up on the evidence by losing it or something like that or they cut him a deal to go up the chain of counterfeiters. Everything else looked like they had him.
On Facebook he announces that stupid post by saying:
Sunshine? Get the hip waders on…Isn’t there something about a truck too? Will this be coming up? Yikes, he only skirted over that part of the tangled mess, cashing check, stolen truck…enters the Texan connection:
Here was Victor’s side of the story… :
After all of this, you would think that he would keep his nose clean? Nope, there’s human trafficking (repeatedly violates his parole) and he starts another SCAM and that’s why we’re all here…he tangles himself in a Political *unproven* quagmire, thinking this will be his salvation…
It didn’t work FatAss… you need to go back to Jail once and for all, there’s no way you can live in society. How I see it, Colorado have been watching you, it’s time to reel you in. The jig is up.
You should be brushing up on this instead *Moron* you could stand to shed a few pounds…
Call it a SPA!
SicLiar said above
Reminds me what he claimed about Deputy Attorney Jones:
So let’s examine Jones full words in context for a moment:
Click to access Dec-2012-Motion-Order-Amending-Warrant.pdf
Not even SicLiar takes exception to that. We saw that disposition when we discovered the warrant in 2008. And the Delaware police saw it in 2007 (in their police report). And FBI agent Henly saw it in 2007 according to Laredo witnesses. It is a completely true and factually accurate statement according to the court records.
Here’s statement 2 broken down):
True and factually accurate as we can see with his 2004 and 2008 motions on the docket.
True and factually accurate – even according to SicLiar – that SicLiar has expressed that verbally – though his actions in failing to do so indicate something else.
True and factually accurate or the warrant would not have needed to be changed.
True and factually accurate as SicLiar has published his FOIA request..
Again, that is a completely true and factually accurate statement.
Sorry for the painful lengthy post above but the point is, every single word of what that motion by Deputy DA Jones said is factually true and accurate. It is not “factually false” as SicLiar claims. And Jones didn’t need to go into all the sordid details about what SicLiar and the DA’s office talked about. Deputy DA Jones may well not have known everything because the warrant goes back 13 years. All Jones needed to provide to the judge in this motion was enough justification to get the warrant changed to nationwide. The judge agreed with him.
So when SicLiar calls the claim about the truck being stolen “knowingly and intentionally false”, I have my doubts based upon his pattern of mental illness, deception, lying and fraud since 2008 and in fact, since he was a juvenile delinquent.
If anything seems “factually false and misleading”, again, it’s SicLiar’s claim that the DA stated he was going to dismiss the case on Oct 3, 2008. The M&N blog checked immediately after SicLiar made that claim on the radio in Oct 2008, found out the case was not being dismissed from multiple official sources in Colorado and SicLiar published the results of that check in his FOIA act request – so he saw them. As well, the warrant got renewed Oct 10, 2008. AND even more damning, SicLiar filed a motion in early Nov 2008 including a request for a public defender for this very same case. One would never bother to do that after Oct 3, 2008 if the case was being dismissed because they wouldn’t need to.
What? You mean that Fat Boy isn’t the final arbitrator as to what is what in court? Like maybe his claims about phone conversations that may or may not have taken place with people who may or may not exist and containing information that may or may not have been stated gets over ridden by the actual court records based upon actual filings and actual documents that he refuses to ever address or respond to? My God, what has this country come to when the written and certified court record is used against a convicted con man’s own words? It’s anarchy I tell you! Anarchy!
Speaking of letting the sunlight in, I couldn’t help but notice that based on his own account (which I assume is merely the tip of the iceberg of the Larry Sinclair crime wave in Colorado), he was obviously raking in lots and lots of money. The nose candy business is normally pretty lucrative. Most likely, even while he was dealing with the theft charges, he was probably still engaged in some amount of “salesmanship.” I am kind of guessing that he never got around to reporting any of this profit to the IRS and since the statute of limitations on reporting these figures is, I believe, 10 years and he was most likely still dealing up to at least 2004 and 2005, doesn’t he have a little bit of tax explaining to do? I realize that he was in a cash only biz and the money was all illegal, but the IRS doesn’t care. They still expect you to report it.
On Mar 31, 2008 at 23:35 GMT, in response to being confronted with the bad check he wrote for baby sitting written on a closed bank account to Laredo indigent Vivian Bowman around April 2007 (Case# TX5-07-mc-00003 that has a copy of the returned check plus Laredo small claim cause#s 7788 and 7789), SicLiar posted on his blog (that we have a copy of):
Meanwhile, from 2001 on, he was also collecting SSDI while the big money from dealing drugs,smuggling illegal aliens and depositing government checks that didn’t belong to him flowed in.
So yeah, the IRS and the SSA would very likely “be shocked at the money that went through” SicLiar’s bank accounts and credit cards (also cited in the 2001 CO case) when they compare them to his tax returns for a guy collecting SSDI.
Of course, if confronted with his “factually false” tax returns, SicLiar will just tell them they’re lying, politically motivated and factually false – just like he’s doing in this case!
Here’s another trend related to this 2001 case:
The compensation he claims for depositing Segura’s government checks in this case was significantly for a car/truck he bought them – so he claims in his 2004 affidavit.
He goes on disability in 2001.
In 2002, he rips Al Stoller auto finance company off for a car (three CA civil cases – maybe more than one car??). I believe Al told me they eventually found a car burned …
In Nov 2006, SicLiar was was convicted for speeding in Alabama. Sinclair was driving a brand new 2007 Pontiac G6, a $20,000+ vehicle at the time.
In 2007, in Maryland and Delaware, he made two insurance claims for a Daewoo Nubira, one for damages that rendered the vehicle inoperable and the other a few days later for theft, He got roughly $5,000 for that vehicle.
When picked up for trying to cash the counterfeit money orders, he claims the first set of counterfeit money orders police discussed with SicLiar was payment for a vehicle his ex-brother-in-law in California owed him – because his ex-brother-in-law did not pay SicLiar for the vehicle when he purchased it from SinLiar. SicLiar had left CA around 2001-2002 …
When the Delaware police asked SicLiar about where the second set of money orders came from, he said they came from New Jersey. He said he received an email from an “unknown source” advising they were coming and then a cellphone call from an “unknown Asian female” asking if he’d received them. But “he did not know their origin” and did not explain why he received them.
So here’s a guy on disability since 2001 and he goes through tens of thousands of dollars in multiple vehicle transactions by 2007 … probably to help cover his financial tracks.
Vehicles trend heavily to be a key part of his modus operandi as an excuse to explain his suspicious financial transactions and that should be a consideration for this case.
In my past experience working with Livery Services…MANY car dealers across the country are/were an easy way to launder money from buyers who had no visible means of income but always had a ton of cash to buy a car or two…or more…u know…like drug dealers and their ilk.
First and foremost, I’m sort of late for the party but before I read every comment in this thread, let me say this:
I tried reading the latest post by Dennis (^5 D) and as hard as it is to read anything by Dumbass, what irks me more is his “OMNIPOTENCE” to determine who “knowingly” did this or that when speaking about people who have filed legal action against him:
1) “…including the efforts by the alleged victim and her family to file previous knowingly false reports with Police just days before the Colorado report was filed…
2) “Despite the intentional and deliberately published false claims that the author Larry Sinclair had failed two polygraph tests
3) “… by filing before Pueblo District Court Judge Jill Mattoon on December 11, 2012 a knowingly factually false motion seeking to have the 2001 Colorado Warrant reissued with a “nationwide extradition” jurisdiction.
4) “At that time Delaware AG Beau Biden had knowingly sought a sealed Grand Jury indictment on a charge accusing Sinclair of theft despite having full knowledge no theft had ever occurred.
5) “…so they could obtain official records without being identified, simply for the purpose of editing and distorting them, former Pueblo Colorado Deputy District Attorney Stephen A. Jones did what many have been doing since 2008, he filed a factually false Motion .
He’s been using this type of jargon since day one of his “entrance on to the internet”….
Have I said lately how much this POS ass-wipe disgusts me to no end?
Kstreet,
I hear you. He picked some odds and ends of legal jargon along the way and beats it to death in the vain hope that it might mean something. But all it comes down to is the failed attempts of a totally narcissistic personality to try and control reality by insisting that he and he alone is the sole source of all information. Classic con man bull. Meanwhile, no documented evidence is ever presented. No third party and/or objective view is tolerated. Not a single shred of proof is given. It is all about him and all about his perception. That is why he can not and will not go to court. That crap simply doesn’t fly there. Almost everything he has at this point to say in his “defense” will not be allowed. He is utterly lacking in any support documentation or evidence. He will no longer control the game (though he only controls it now in his own pea brain). He will have no choice. He will either have to bolt or he will serve the rest of his life in prison.
Meanwhile, in a desperate attempt to look like a new/op site and hoping to act relevant, SinkLiar has just produced a short and extremely derivative piece attacking Obama for not yet producing memos and documents relating to US drone strikes against two American citizens working overseas with Al Qaeda. Amazing that this eagle legal has the time to break from manufacturing his pretend defense, but that’s OK. I think it is all “borrowed” from Fox News. As always in his vast and continuous criminal career, his thefts are repeatedly two-bit and sleazy. BTW Fat Boy, part of the problem of this dubious program with drones goes back to George W., the guy who started the whole process. But don’t worry, I don’t want to interrupt your vodka drinking tonight. Your booze time is limited (unless the rules in prison have changed).
“attacking Obama for not yet producing memos and documents”
But for his original attack on Obama:
– where is the limo driver he promised to produce ? Try doing a google search for “Jagir P Multani” (his final version of the Limo driver’s name) – there is nobody that comes up with that name unrelated to SicLiar’s allegations.
– where are the credit card records showing the limo rental, bar expenses & hotel ?
– where are the limo receipts he claimed that he had ?
– where are the hotel receipts ?
– where are his phone records from back then ?
– where are his phone records – that anyone could get online like his hotel points report – from just a few months before he came out with this allegation showing he spoke with the Obama campaign in the fall of 2007 ?
– where is the airline ticket or boarding pass ?
– where are the bar receipts ?
– where are the witnesses ?
etc
He promised he would produce documents and proof. All we ever saw were some forged-well-after-the-fact Choice Hotel points printouts, a failed lie detector test and a slew of lies trying to hold an ever changing story together.
For his subsequent allegation that Obama had Donald Young murdered
– where are the phone records to substantiate that SicLiar ever talked with Donald Young – that could easily have been obtained online ? When SicLiar claimed the Chicago Police had a Grand Jury subpoena his phone records from Sprint/Nextel – to explain why he could not produce them, that claim ran into a problem: There had not been and there was NO Grand Jury reviewing the murder of Donald Young.
etc
Zero documents or evidence produced ever.
Even in his 2004 affidavit, claiming “irrefutable evidence” … there is none. Just a painful hunk of his side of the story with nothing to back it up.
The hypocrisy never ends.
http://www.larrysinclair.net/
Top of page:
“www.LarrySinclair.net/
is for sale along with
other Larry Sinclair domains
sales@lsnewsgroup.com”
I don’t see that on Sinclair News.
As the IRS and SSA largely financed the development of these websites and significantly helped to generate all the other proceed$ from this Scam, I hope they received their rightful cut (if he gets anything for them).
I suspect if one waits until they expire, they can probably be had for next to nothing.
From Parisi v Sinclair court filings:
Click to access Ex-c-Statement-from-Karl-Milligan.pdf
In the spring of 2008, Pulitzer Prize winner Crewdson spent five days with Sinclair trying to verify his allegations.
After that, Crewdson told one of us
And another
His “Appearance of Counsel” date is the 28th (this coming Monday). Since we haven’t heard him begging for money to fly to Colorado, his public defender will probably show up for him on that date. The Colorado court docket next week should give us an idea where this is going.
Can’t wait.
I predict he will have a new brain tumor by Sunday. Or maybe he is currently buying up all the Tic Tacs in sight.
FatAss better hurry up with Parts II and III of his tale…he might be in Jail.
BTW he must be peeved off about something, he’s recently changed his blawg so no one can copy/paste over there.
Oopsie FatAss it didn’t work….
Thanks WTPL? for the tips 🙂
A sucker must indeed be born every minute:
Thanks to Where’s The Proof Larry? we have another new post —–> HERE Let’s move everything there, K?