The Regulator Too

Welcome to our strange and wonderful place!

Deja Vu All Over Again…

on June 5, 2012

On Larry Sinclair’s “news” website, he’s had an advertisement up for a while now, showing how his readers could purchase  a copy of the 1000 advanced copies being prepared (signed and numbered) of  his new “book”, When One Man Stands.

The kicker is this:

There will only be 1000 advanced, signed, numbered copies made available three months prior to September 18, 2012 nationwide release

Now, by my calculations, that would mean that the first 1000 copies of book will be available for distribution to those who made advanced orders in THIRTEEN DAYS!

We’ll be watching diligently to see if those who may have ordered the book actually get the book.


34 responses to “Deja Vu All Over Again…

  1. gilligan25 says:

    oh, geez, not this shit again. He pissed away all the moola from the first pamphlet on himself (and Poor Maxine), had to have someone else write the damn thing for him, whined like a two year old once he finally scammed enough money to get that piece of shit printed and had to sign every book (like he promised) and failed to include the DVD he promised. I expect no less this time–except maybe more whining, faux illnesses and his usual bullshit. I wonder if we’ll get Suicide by Tic Tacs Redux?

  2. gilligan25 says:

    kstreet, I bet he hasn’t written a damn thing. It’ll be up to his Sugar Momma (Parsons) to clean up his mess, give him money, write his book, give him money, find a publisher, give him money… nauseum.

    • kstreet607 says:

      There you have it! We’ll be able to tell whether the book is in Parson’s voice or Sinclair’s voice. Sinclair’s first book was written like a third grader who felt abused by his classmates and started making up lies about everyone.

      I’ve never read Parsons work, but something tells me that it will simply be a study in batshit crazy!

      • Dennis says:

        First tip off that the book is written by Parsons – long and utterly pointless attempts to revive the Red Scare of the 1950s combined with weak metaphors and half-baked fast food allusions.

    • gilligan25 says:

      No one but no one wanted to run against Dianne Feinstein, so there are all kinds of fringe candidates, nutballs and wingnuts in the mix. All Orly has to do is come in 2nd and she’ll be in the final. So far, her funding consists of a $280k loan to herself…she’ll need a whole lot more moola if she plans on running a real race. Perhaps The Donald can help.

      BTW, the turnout in Wisco is predicted to be almost 80%. Astounding. They’ve called in extra poll workers for Milwaukee county and if that’s the case, that doesn’t bode well for Walker.

    • Dennis says:

      Yes, and once Orly is in the Senate she can finally grill Obama. Wheeeeee!!!!! No wonder it feels like the Zombie Apocalypse out there. The brain dead are on the move.

  3. gilligan25 says:

    hahahahahahahahahahaha! Someone called into a DC radio station (WMAL) saying he was on a bus from Michigan to Wisco so those busloads of Michiganders could vote. One freeper posted where the interstates from that direction would come into Wisco (no doubt there are freeper snipers on the overpasses, waiting, just waiting…..) I can’t believe how stupid and gullible they are–but then they’ve had this “voter fraud” bullshit pounded into their brains, so that may be why they’re just acting like a bunch of hysterical idiots. Apparently, they’ve never heard of “trust but verify,” but I also know why Orson Welles was so successful in War of the Worlds….

  4. Borat says:

    War of the Worlds radio broadcast

    That was TRUE and then they covered it up…………… no?

  5. Dennis says:

    Just took a quick peek at Lardo’s World. The US Appeal Court hearing for oral arguments on the Parisi case is set for Sept. 20 and LardAss (not understanding what they mean by oral) is loudly announcing that he will be there to represent himself. Yep, he will now have three federal judges for some dirty pictures on his laptop and another round of such brilliant legal statements such as “…uhhh…ohhh…uhum…” and the all time winner “…you were serious, your honor?” Yes, the farce continues. Too bad the case doesn’t really depend upon him in any way. Otherwise he would be back in the slammer.

    • gilligan25 says:

      I wonder which of the appellate judge he’ll flirt with this time.

      But this should be good. I wish I was close enough to go. I need a good laugh.

    • gilligan25 says:

      Damn, I forgot the throat clearing and the lizard-like lip licking and smacking.

      • kstreet607 says:

        I used to think LardAss was on heroin or crack…but I totally forgot “hillbilly heroin”…METH! Gilli, your mentioning lip smacking is what made me think of that. I finally saw a woman (Housewives of Orange County) who had a meth addiction and her gestures and demeanor were similar to LardAss!!

  6. gilligan25 says:

    The polls have closed in Wisconsin.

    They’ve run out of ballots and voter registration forms in Milwaukee, Madison (Dane county) and other areas. If people are in line when the polls close, they will be able to register to vote and to vote.

    • kstreet607 says:

      If people are in line when the polls close, they will be able to register to vote and to vote.

      That’s my understanding as well, so somebody better bring over some ballots! LOL

  7. gilligan25 says:

    Election roundup; Scott Walker won the recall election in Wisconsin; ditto for the lt. guv and three out of four of the Wisco state senators. One GOP senator from Racine (near the IL border and home of the kringle) lost to a Dem. It was a tight race, but I’m not sure if the vote margin will trigger a recall. This may be where those phantom buses ended up.

    Orly Taitz came in 5th in the Cal Senate race. She’s already making her “I’m gonna sue” noises–this time, she sounds like she’s going to sue the GOP and anyone else she can find.

    And OMFG birfer lawyer Gary Kreep won a superior court judgeship in San Diego county CA by a very slim margin. There may well be a recount.

  8. Dennis says:

    Based upon the election round up, we can expect Obama to be declared ineligible to run for office in San Diego county, especially after Orly Taitz finds the one judge who thinks she makes sense; Orly will go on to become gov. of California as part of a settlement after she sues every man, woman, and child in California for being from somewhere else; all of those buses of illegal voters had gotten confused and went to Minnesota by mistake.

  9. Dennis says:

    Some interesting figures:
    Wisconsin Recall Vote: Exit Poll Shows Key To Scott Walker Victory

    I’m not so sure that Walker won the recall so much as Barrett lost it. About 36% of union households actually supported Walker. Another reminder of what my old man once said about voters and a part of his anatomy.

  10. gilligan25 says:


    I agree with you–and your old man. Of course, Walker spending in excess of $40 mil vs. Barrett’s $4 mil had something to do with it, too.

    There was a reason Obama stayed away from this race, but the GOP is still trying to pin the loss on Obama. They really ought to read the exit polling data in Wisco:

    The same blurring can be seen in Walker’s performance among supporters of President Barack Obama, who led Mitt Romney by a double-digit margin (53 percent to 42 percent) among those who voted. However, Walker won 17 percent of those who say they will support Obama in November.

    And damn near everyone in Wisco who could vote did vote.

    And I’m sure Orly will sue Obama in San Diego county, but like everybody who gets near Lady Liberty, she hates Gary Kreep. I can’t wait for her to sue the CAGOP because they didn’t endorse her. It’d be great if it distracted her from birfer stuff, but no such luck. She’s due in Indiana next week.

    • Dennis says:

      Yes, Walker out spent Barrett by an incredible sum. Kind of brings a tear to your eyes when you behold so many patriotic corporate “citizens” exercising their court protected right to buy elections.

      • gilligan25 says:

        Yes, thank you, Citizens United.

        Most of Walker’s money came from out of state. I don’t know how much he spent per vote, but I do remember when I lived there, I said I’d rather have the candidates just give me the money directly instead of spending the money on TV ads. Hell, in one election, it got so bad I hid out at Animal Planet–but they found me there. i was PISSED. It was TV ads, radio ads, billboards, mailers, stuff hanging from my mailbox, candidates/surrogates at my door, at any kind of sporting event or picnic or art fair or social gathering of more than two people….

  11. gilligan25 says:


    I figured out why my comments are going into moderation and fixed it. Sorry!

  12. Dennis says:

    Lardo Land updates:
    Ilse goes on a tear declaring the vote in Wisconsin to be a victory against the dark forces of communism, socialism and progressive politics (she is accidentally right about the last part – wrong attitude but progressive politics got a bad lump out of this one). The Unknown Staff Writer (must blog with a sack over his head) rattles on how the vote in WI is a stunning defeat for Obama and Bill Clinton (since he never cut out any eye holes in the sack, he obviously couldn’t read the exist poll data that presents a very different view). Finally, the Fat One himself goes on the warpath against Dan Parisi (whose appeal is against Amazon, not Lardo) while trying hard to insert himself into an appeal case that he is not actually involved in, go figure.Naturally, he is also working hard on telling his followers (Larry, Curly and Moe) that the previous court decision proves that he is always telling the truth (in reality, he was lucky the judge basically ignored him and decided upon some major weak legal points on Parisi’s part).

  13. Meesh says:

    Once again FatAss er Administrator…buries crap. Here it is for anyone who doesn’t go there…. 🙄
    When Enough Is Enough, Is Enough!
    June 6, 2012
    By Administrator

    Parisi Litigation Abuse of Courts-In Our OPINION
    NOTE: This article is written based on clearly available information which is PUBLIC RECORD as filed by Daniel Parisi by and through his Counsel Richard J. Oparil of Washinggton DC’s Patton Boggs LLP. In addition some OPINION’s have been expressed as to the actions of Parisi and his Counsel which are protected by the United States Constitutions First Amendment.

    We have tried to sit back and allow the Plaintiff’s in Parisi et al v Sinclair et al make fools of themselves without commenting too much, but there comes a time when enough BS is enough, and you have to call it what it is. We are going to do just that.

    On February 28, 2012 the Honorable Judge Richard J. Leon granted Sinclair’s Motion to Dismiss the claims brought by Daniel Parisi and in his decision ruled that the Book Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies and Murder? Was not defamatory as alleged by Parisi and his host of named businesses. Though Sinclair did not move to certify Judge Leon’s dismissal as a Final Judgment, Parisi did file on March 13, 2012 a Motion to Reconsider and in said Motion noted that though the Feb 28, 2012 ruling had not been formally entered as a Final Judgment, Parisi was going to consider it as such for the purposes of his March 13, 2012 Motion to Alter etc…

    Sinclair then moved for an extension of time for which to file a response to Parisi’ 3-13-2012 Motion which was granted to April 2, 2012. On March 29, 2012 Daniel Parisi by and through his counsel Richard J. Oparil contacted Sinclair via email proposing a settlement as is clearly stated in the Stipulation and Voluntary Dismissal filed with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on March 30, 2012. While we will not discuss the contents of the “purported settlement” as is noted in the Stipulation and Voluntary Dismissal, we are simply noting what is part of the PUBLIC RECORD. The dismissal was filed before any response to Parisi’ March 13, 2012 Motion whereby making said Motion a moot issue, yet Parisi in his Appeal of the District Court’s dismissal of in the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit decided to file the March 13, 2012 Moot Motion with the Appeals Court in the Appendix. The filing of the Motion was clearly inadmissible as it had nothing to do with the District Court’s ruling as to Amazon and was included for the very specific purpose of doing what Mr. Parisi (in our Opinion)has been doing from the beginning; using the United States Courts to defame and slander Sinclair.

    Today June 5, 2012 Mr. Parisi filed his Reply Brief to the Brief which was filed on May 17, 2012.

    United States Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit

    Notice of Docket Activity

    The following transaction was entered on 06/05/2012 at 9:45:46 AM EDT and filed on 06/05/2012

    Case Name: Daniel Parisi, et al v. Lawrence Sinclair, et al

    Case Number: 11-7077

    Document(s): Document(s)

    Docket Text: APPELLANT REPLY BRIEF [1377061] filed by Daniel Parisi, White House Communications Inc., Whitehouse Network LLC and Inc. [Service Date: 06/05/2012 ] Length of Brief: 6780 words. [11-7077] (Oparil, Richard)

    As has become a standard practice of Mr. Parisi he has yet again filed items with the Court which were not ever a part of the Lower Courts case leading up to its ruling, nor is it admissible, and lastly it again contains outright falsehoods. The fact that Mr. Parisi continues to allow his counsel to engage in these practices demonstrates his intent to use the Court’s to attack Mr. Sinclair after dismissing his claims against him because it prevents Sinclair from being able to challenge him. Or so it appears they think anyway.

    Unlike Mr. Parisi as is clearly demonstrated by the multiple differing Sworn Declaration’s in the PUBLIC RECORD of the US District Court and the US Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Parisi and his Attorney Richard J. Oparil; Sinclair throughout the Court case has not filed any sworn declarations claiming one thing only to have to file another one claiming something different. Parisi and Oparil on the other hand have filed at least three (3) separate Sworn Declarations under penalty of Perjury swearing Parisi was a resident in at least three (3) different area’s in order to attempt to have a more favorable law apply to a case they had already failed on. Unlike Parisi, Sinclair did not have to file multiple sworn declarations as is clearly demonstrated in the Courts PUBLIC RECORD, swearing under penalty of perjury that Tammy Byrnes was a relative of Sinclair’s, only to have to file six (6) months later a Sworn declaration claiming Byrnes was not only NOT a relative of Sinclair’s but that as Sinclair swore to six (6) months earlier, Byrnes not only did not know Sinclair, but she had never spoken to him, which is exactly what Sinclair had always said. But Parisi goes one step further. Parisi pays a Private Investigator to sign a sworn declaration stating Byrnes told him one thing, while filing a sworn declaration by Byrnes herself saying something different. Only Parisi failed to note the Private Investigator had already been sanctioned by the State for perjuring himself on an application for licensing in the State of Maine. But that still wasn’t enough. After having the declarations stricken from the record, Parisi on March 13, 2012 files yet Two (2) more sworn declarations from Byrnes signed in October 2011 and December 2011 contradicting what was sworn to on the previous four filed sworn declarations. Again, all is PUBLIC RECORD.

    Today, June 5, 2012 after failing in the US District Court to refute solid verification supporting Sinclair’s claims about receiving phone calls; about former Chicago Tribune Reporter John Crewdson confirming he had personally spoke with the individual who called Sinclair; and the individual confirmed for Crewdson the same information provided Sinclair; Parisi files a March 28, 2012 statement from Maryland Private Investigator Karl Milligan attempting to represent that Mr. Crewdson now is claiming different.

    United States Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit

    Notice of Docket Activity

    The following transaction was entered on 06/05/2012 at 9:42:10 AM EDT and filed on 06/05/2012

    Case Name: Daniel Parisi, et al v. Lawrence Sinclair, et al

    Case Number: 11-7077

    Document(s): Document(s)

    Docket Text: MOTION filed [1377060] by Daniel Parisi, White House Communications Inc., Whitehouse Network LLC and Inc. for judicial notice. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 06/18/2012) [Service Date: 06/05/2012 by CM/ECF NDA] Pages: 11-15. [11-7077] (Oparil, Richard)

    The statement from Mr. Milligan by Court Rules is hearsay and inadmissible but Parisi and counsel know that. See its file it electronically, get in the Court record and worry about the Court throwing it out later. Funny thing is, when you consider that Parisi filed multiple filings with the Court attempting to paint Crewdson as being uncredible and making statements about how he was fired by the Chicago Tribune in 2008, its almost laughable that he now wants to file a hearsay statement from a private investigator rather than an affidavit from Mr. Crewdson himself, and then only point out what Sinclair has already made clear in his book no less; which is no different from what Sinclair has stated all along throughout Parisi’ continued abuse of the Courts for the mere purpose of defaming Sinclair (in our opinion!): that Crewdson stated he would not write a story until he had been able to speak with the Limo driver. The Declaration of Mr. Milligan however states

    Mr. CREWDSON was asked some additional, basic questions but stated that he did not recall much about LARRY SINCLAIR. Mr. CREWDSON stated that he never ‘did anything with it’ referring to information provided by LARRY SINCLAIR, and SINCLAIR’s story.

    Oh, but the investigator had to make the standard reference that has become a trademark of Parisi’ litigation against Sinclair and other defendants by claiming

    “Mr. Crewdson eventually acknowledged knowing LARRY SINCLAIR by describing him as “oh that nut job.””

    You can see the Declaration of Mr. Milligan HERE

    Despite Parisi’ continued efforts to defame and attack Mr. Sinclair using the Courts under the cover of claiming Sinclair somehow defamed Mr. Parisi for telling a truthful accounting of his story in his 2009 book Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder? The result remains the same, Sinclair’s story remains unchanged, while Parisi’ changes based on every filing he makes with the Courts. First Parisi by and through his counsel paints Mr. Crewdson as some unreliable fired reporter and now he tries to imply with a hearsay declaration from a paid private investigator that Mr. Crewdson is now changing what he communicated to Sinclair via email in 2008 would be comical if it weren’t for the fact that Parisi has abused the Courts and the Courts integrity to wage this ridiculous farce.

    While we do not have any knowledge which would allow us to state as a matter of fact, we do hold the OPINION and BELIEF that the April 4, 2012 letter sent to with the March 28, 2012 Declaration of Karl Milligan attached was done so in an effort by Parisi to attempt to scare into settling with Parisi. We are entitled to our Opinion’s and Belief’s and that’s ours as it relates to Parisi’ efforts to use this ridiculous hearsay declaration from yet another paid Private investigator.

    So with that said, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH, IS ENOUGH already, as despite Mr. Parisi’ strategic move to remove Mr. Sinclair from the case so he can continue to make completely baseless and distorted representations to the Court, as of 7:29:26 PM EDT Mr. Sinclair has filed a MOTION Pursuant to FAR Rule 29(b) For Leave to File An Amicus Brief, with the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

    United States Court of Appeals

    for District of Columbia Circuit

    Notice of Docket Activity

    The following transaction was entered on 06/05/2012 at 7:29:26 PM EDT and filed on 06/05/2012

    Case Name: Daniel Parisi, et al v. Lawrence Sinclair, et al

    Case Number: 11-7077

    Document(s): Document(s)

    Docket Text: MOTION filed [1377292] by Lawrence W. Sinclair for leave to intervene [Disclosure Listing: Not Applicable to this Party] [Service Date: 06/05/2012 ] [11-7077] (Sinclair, Lawrence)

    First Amendment Case The Media Should Be Covering

    Parisi v Sinclair Still Active As To Defendant Why?

    Parisi V Sinclair Now Dismissed As To Lawrence W. Sinclair & SPI.

    Daniel Parisi Files Motion Confirming Sinclair TRUTHFUL About Feb 2008 Phone Calls

  14. Dennis says:

    What LardBrain refuses to tell his “readers” is that the judge’s dismissal of the suit had nothing to do with Lardo’s truthfulness (or lack there of). It exclusively had to do with Parisi’s inability to prove that the claims in his booklet did him any business and/or financial harm. I don’t think the judge actually gave a rat’s ass about Fat Boy’s crap.

    Likewise, Parisi is filing an appeal in order to still try and shake money out of Amazon (though it is, at best, a really wild and unlikely shot). Basically, this all gets back to the question as to rather or not an e-publisher is protected from such suits in the same way that a traditional publisher is protected. Most likely, Parisi is going to lose again. I strongly suspect that neither he nor Amazon would want LardAss popping up in the courtroom. They don’t need the cheap laughs.

    Of course LardButt will now be asking for money for his Washington trip and “court” appearance. Good grief, this bum has so many “fund drives” going on, he’s worse than a PBS station.

  15. gilligan25 says:

    ‘Oh, that nut job” LOVE IT! And here I thought that Crewsdon was such an ally of Larrdo and now he can’t remember much about Chubbo, in fact, nary a thing–except that Sinklair is a NUT JOB.


    Of course FatBoy wants to insert himself into the Parisi-Amazon appeal. He gets a free trip to DC out of it, if those idiots will pay for it. He cannot add anything to the case, not a thing, except to scream, THIS IS ALL ABOUT ME. He and Orly have so much in common, mostly that malignant narcissism thang.

    And Ol’ Thorton seems to be tearing a page out of the John Birch Society playbook. Don’t think she’s a Bircher, though, because they really really really do not like homosexuals.

    • Dennis says:

      Thorton isn’t a Bircher only because they too are pinko. As for the homosexual thing, I sometimes wonder if she sticks with Fat Boy only because she thinks she is going to “reform” him. The lady definitely has some major bats flying around in her head.

      Oh sure, Crewsdon had some problems remembering Lardo, but he kind of summed it all up in the end.

      Yes, LardBrain wants to go back to court. He must have a fantasy that this will all go to the Supreme Court and when he pulls out his laptop with the dirty pictures, Judge Clarence Thomas will seize the laptop as “evidence” and announce that he must retire to chambers to study it more thoroughly.

  16. gilligan25 says:

    Thorton has probably offered to pay for his homosexual conversion therapy because it (“it” meaning Larrd) sure doesn’t fit with the rest of her far far right extremist views.

    I wonder how Justice Thomas is going to signal to Nut Job that he wants him in chambers with the laptop–I mean the guy makes Silent Cal look positively chatty next to Thomas in court. I think the Supremes would join the gallery in a collective gasp if Thomas said *anything* at oral arguments.

    Nut job….CHORTLE! Maybe that’s why FatBoy wants to join in the appeal–I mean not only does Crewsdon not remember him, but describes him as a NUT JOB. Too too funny!!

  17. Borat says:

    he is off his meds,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,LOL

  18. kstreet607 says:

    I’m in a mood. I can’t stand to watch the punditry on TV. I don’t wanna hear anymore about Mittens or Scotty boy. So, I’ve been nursing the knees and back all day. Thanks for holding down the fort guys.

    Tomorrow should be a brighter day.

    I see Silly Fat boy hasn’t changed in four years…what a waist of air and space.

  19. Meesh says:

    There’s a new post
    New post is here!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: